Thanos being CGI didn’t hurt Josh Brolin’s profile.

or why didn’t JoCat getting run out due to being the target of the internet mob earn even a peep?

Okay man, calm down. All we’re saying is if Palworld really did use official Pokemon assets in their games, then a lawsuit is justified.

1. “Zooming in” in 3d space is a description of a camera movement. You’re talking about scaling the model.

My favorite part of this story is that nintendo hasn’t actually said anything. People are getting defensive over armchair analysis. 

It looks good so far, but what I’m really after is a first person dungeon crawler where you play as Marcus Brody trying to escape his own museum.

You see how this whole article is structured, right? It begins - literally the opening sentence - by acknowledging this could be an “embarrassing gap in our knowledge”, then I repeatedly mock myself for reporting 23-year-old news throughout, and then finish by mocking us again by suggesting we’ll report on a Wii egg…

The Grandfather of Tomb Raider and Uncharted!

This is so fucking stupid it hurts.

The MLB can’t copyright a baseball bat (its too vague of a concept to copyright), but they can say you can’t publicly broadcast a MLB game without their consent. Consent involves paying some sort of fee with some sort of legal restrictions to boot since the game is copyrighted.

I literally said that “there’s absolutely nothing wrong with making up your own rules”—do you even read before you get triggered?

if players have to disable half the game to make it competitive + they somehow feel entitled to complain about that— as if nintendo are the ones making the mistake—then i’m sorry to say the players are the ones who are mistaken in their complaints. there’s absolutely nothing wrong with making up your own rules, but…

LOL I love how you say that ridiculously invalid Microsoft comment, on a article SPECIFICALLY talking about a game SONY paid a dev NOT to release on its competitor. This game, is literally an example of SONY buying their way to market domination like they have for the past generation and a half. Youre just completely w…

Except, as the sony fanboys love to point out, microsoft is in third place. They are literally incapable of being a monopoly. The closest thing to a monoply in console gaming is sony who is able to deny games to the competition, even those they did not make, raise prices arbitrarily and do so with absolute impunity.

This feels like fake outrage because its Microsoft. Next.

I’m not surprised. This policy hits a certain sub-section of indie devs incredibly hard. Imagine spending X plus years on a game only to find out now that releasing it can only financially hurt you. All that work goes in the trash and the amount of debt and overhead keeps layering on. This can pretty much ruin a…

No, it's theoretically possible you owe unity more than you have earned via the game.

If you’re going to try to correct them at least be right. It hasn’t been released for Xbox.

Kotaku is creating a lot of hit pieces against this game as a result of being on Bethesda’s blacklist. Take it all with a grain of salt.