yhummo
yhummo
yhummo

“And more importantly, by not resolving the current debacle to the player and owners’ satisfaction, NFL leadership has hurt Papa John’s shareholders” Coming to a middle-ground resolution? That sounds like racism to you?

And your tunnel vision implies that you are likely a puritanical tightwad. Excessively conceited. Consider for a moment that an individual can be both trans and supportive of a story line that pokes fun at itself and its many forms of sexuality. Jesus, get real, or would you further suggest that all of those

Should learn what a fascist is before you go around punching “them”.

He’s evidently not as ‘tone-deaf’ as as this article wants to imply. In reading the entirety of his interview he makes many valid points to consider. And as far as him being a “piece of shit trying to tell women how to feel” here are some sentiments from some women that can keep a beat: http://www.spiked-online.com/new

Heresy! Thine masters shalt make certain you repent and receive righteous purge from your idolatrous worship named Reason! Evidence is not tolerated here. 

I was in a long term affair at one point in my life that destroyed a lot of deep long-standing relationships. It was the worst time in my life - as it is commonly the worst time in a lot of peoples lives. Don’t be the bigger asshole that shoots before they think.

What a ridiculous ad! I would only split one hair in this article. “The Democratic Party is trash. It is the reason Hillary Clinton lost.” I hope it is clear enough to your readers that Hillary Clinton being a part of the Democratic Party means Hillary Clinton is a part of that trash and pretty much all of why Hillary

Sure it is. Our society might be but our justice system most certainly is not. If he is IN FACT guilty then sure, he should be tried and found guilty. If he is IN FACT innocent, then you’d hang them anyways just to look good to the face of society.

What the lawyer said - was in a public address - outside of the courtroom and he was almost disbarred for saying it. And as one would HOPE despite a childs feelings should a body have probable cause then the justifiable thing to do would be to take the evidence to the court. They didn’t.

That is what a lawyer said - in a public address - outside of the courtroom. And he was almost disbarred for saying it. In addition to this, the court hearing that you are referring to was a separate hearing concerning child custody motioned by Allen.

Not wrong. If you read the whole article you shared, the prosecutor was almost disbared for making the public statement. Public statement meaning it had no bearing or relevance to anything outside of his professional opinion. The article then goes on to state that the conveyning body sent in to investigate the

Those are some undeniable facts! It’s right there in the headline. Listen, if he did any of those things then I am in 100 percent (even 1000%) agreement that the victim get the closure and vindication they deserve through the process of law. But considering that nothing you shared (even the separate custody filing

Maybe because the 6 month official investigation concluded that the accusations were baseless and so they wouldn’t even mandate a trial. Until he’s found guilty of a crime he’s presumed innocent. So I guess, go out there and find the evidence the experts didn’t and bring him to justice. Then I think we’d be in

You know, I am a long time reader of this site. I usually love it except when I am reading something horrible that has happened. In that case, even though the offense is usually sensationalized - as a tabloid do - I still find it a refreshing take on a side of reality that isn’t super mainstream. And sometimes I

As the anecdotal interviewer suggests, the analogy between the “...Jewish person and a Nazi?” is in fact incorrect. To better the statement the interviewee would need to rephrase the analogy to read - How offensive and absurd would it be if, instead of a black person and a white person having this conversation, it was

I think there is no disagreement in what you and I are actually saying. And I agree with your comment... I am just pointing out that it is a tabloid. For better or worse.

Didn’t say anything about our (presuming) dip-stick-in-chief. And I agree, the current President is a sad comical waste of time. He is a living tabloid the likes of which you would find wheat pasted to the underside of a public urinal. But that’s also not the world. There are PLENTY of things happening around the

Tabloid: A newspaper having pages half the size of those of a standard newspaper, typically popular in style and dominated by headlines, photographs, and sensational stories.

I think she was right to come forward. But He kissed her WITH her permission and pantomimed - without touching her according to the picture - his feels. They are both right, it wasn’t funny. But it also wasn’t assault according to her own statement. So lying about what is in both this article AND the official