yhummo
yhummo
yhummo

You seem to have a rather well thought out understanding of yourself and your stance on the author in this situation. Can I ask your personal thoughts on trans persons not taking offense to Rowling statements and also standing behind her statements/role as a female author?

Thanks for your reply. It’s helpful. And no apologies needed. I get that whenever talking about hot-button issues - on AV Club no less - context can be lost in translation.

No, I am asking for clarity. Please don’t misinterpret my question as I am asking because I am learning about this issue and am trying to not only read science journals, articles and what have yous, but also through hearing the opinions of people - including you. So if you WOULD humor me, I would appreciate it kindly.

The only reason for making that statement is to reaffirm that you don’t consider trans women to be women.”

Can I please ask for your clarification?

Women in the sense of sociological women? (ie. socially constructed) Women in the sense of biological sex?
Both? Neither? Your elaboration?

You don’t know how long I’ve been trying to recall the name of this show. All I had to go off was the memory that the toys came with a cassette and that was getting me nowhere. Thanks for the unintentional salvation you have bestowed upon me Deeeejgj, you angel of nostalgic kids television.

I’ve nothing against ‘girly’, with the exception that the style just doesn’t hold my interest. But generally speaking, I am of the same mind as you. Violence and the messaging around it have always existed, but there was definitely a loosening of standards around both in the 80's and 90's that led to cross-genre media

Don’t just look at it. Beat it.”

Ken Ham has really upped his Creation Museum game... GOD DAMN!

My only complaint about this update is the screen ratio. Windows 3:2 and Googles previously used ratio suited my personal needs much better. The things we get to quibble about.

Your cookie is on its way. Well deserved.

Spot on, but I will add this: “They’re going for realism.” Turns eyes towards Cloud. Hmm.

Would you kindly point me to the Kotaku article covering Barret? I am interested to read the perspective shift as I seem to be in the minority group, thinking that he looks awesome and sounds even more badass than he did in the original

Mars is a spherical cow. 

Here is a genuine question. When talking about the physiology of the human body with regards to sex. How does a lay person like me parse scientific fact from subjective motivation? For example, when world champion and Trans-activist, Dr. Rachel McKinnon states a series of data-sets championing the fuzziness of

Ashlee Evan-Smith, who took on a fight with Fallon Fox and won has also stated that she wouldn’t do it again. Vocalizing that there was a biologically grounded advantage Fox held as a biologically sexed male/trans-gendered female. Physiological facts would back up that statement. Without discussing a future where

Dear Author,

SPF Gel is the holy grail of sunscreen. Easier on everyone. Requires no environmentally questionable wet-wiping tactics. Make application on hairy bodies possible... that’s perhaps the biggest miracle of all.

Killing indiscriminately is surely among the worst aspects of humanity... under your logic, how many games over the course of decades should we not find a surprising amount (misplaced) correlation? Or are you perfectly fine with dealing in your self-preferrential double standards?

I have kids that play... nothing is free.

Seems like the perfect candidate to portray the One Above All. Fair, delightful, not-concerned with the trials of man.