This was my exact thought. How on earth do they find any women to serve on such juries?!?
woodle for hillary
woodle
Pretty much anyone who’s ever been sexually assaulted or done anti-sexual violence prevention work is deemed “biased” in sexual assault cases, and dismissed from the jury pool due to their supposed inability to be “impartial”. They have to call 2-3x as many people for the jury pool on a rape case compared to normal. I…
who’s the girl standing in front of you?
It is hard to top Jay Cutler’s senior portrait.
idk, I think mine’s better...
My mum still buys the cans of frozen oj and mixes them in one of those old-school jugs with the pump-handle for stirring. Not only that, she adds half a package of Tang to it “for flavour!”
Seriously. That isn’t parity in coverage, it’s a lie. Clinton has issued policy proposals often ever since the beginning of the primary, and regularly discusses them as well.
I love that second tweet.. It’s like after he was done writing, he thought, “Oh yeah... forgot to add the ‘some people say’ almost!”
The plan also calls for better enforcing of the 2008 Mental Health Parity Act, which directed that insurance providers cover mental health and substance abuse treatments the same way they do medical and surgical ones.
Trump supporters responded, “Benghazi, email, brain damage, blow job.”
“The full initiative is laid out in a fact sheet.”
“The plan also calls for better enforcing of the 2008 Mental Health Parity Act, which directed that insurance providers cover mental health and substance abuse treatments the same way they do medical and surgical ones.”
The bad “optics” of this story is entirely of the media’s making.
Why wouldn’t I? This isn’t a partisan thing, this is people trying to close a foundation that does excellent work because of the name on the door.
And the question still remains how many of those people she would have met with even if they hadn’t donated.
do you really think the Clinton Foundation is doing either more effective or more important charitable work than the Red Cross?
Yes, let’s shut down a charity that provides money for the poorest people in the entire world because Hillary met with 85 people who had donated to the foundation while she was sec. of state. Ehrmahgod, 85 people! That’s like, such a huge percentage of the number of people that the top diplomat of the world’s most…
Exactly. The Clinton Foundation is objectively a well-run charitable organization putting its funds to good use. The optics of it are entirely separate from the fact that it’s actually helping people who need help.
Counterpoint: No.