wolffiaanguste
Wolffia Anguste
wolffiaanguste

Hhhhhhow is it that you’re so fucked that you can’t even deny these things, instead trying to put a positive spin on it

Oh god yes. Was at a booth next to him for most of a Con and heard him make several gross sexual comments to (and about) women in his various character voices. Hearing Pooh joke about motorboating someone made my skin crawl.

His defenses seem to be making things even worse. Joking about sexual abuse is somehow funny? Torturing a dog is somehow “discipline”?

Public service announcement that there is no such thing as “disciplining” a dog. Mammals learn best through positive reinforcement. Punishment is traumatic and nothing more. Plus, if your puppy “does something wrong,” that’s your fault. 100% of the time. Poops on the carpet? Your fault for not taking the pup outside

A voice of Winnie the Pooh. Not the voice. If anyone gets the honor of the definite article, it’s Sterling Holloway.

“I forgot I was torturing the dog...” is NOT a great defense strategy

you coulda skipped straight to the metal bucket and i’d have been for the death sentence already

Wow, this guy is a scumbag. 

Is it a terrible surprise that one of the biggest voice actors in American animation (he’s in like every single Disney movie) is a fucking scum bag? Seems like a model employee for the industry. His responses to the allegations are just straight-up admissions of guilt, too, basically stating that he did it but it

Of course Winnie the Pooh is a rapist in this timeline. Of course.

Please do. *Popcorn*

Not a leap to think she wouldn't allow him around the kids with no proof of parentage.  You are letting your experience color your impression of most men. Same line of reasoning some racists use. Congratulations. 

Done. Now What? Plenty of good fathers around.  Sorry you were not exposed to one. Your personal experiences do not define the world. 

I love all this “baseless claim” bullshit.  Show me anywhere in the article where it even hints that the man made his claim with no basis.  The only detail given EITHER WAY is that he is an ex-boyfriend, and that leans towards possible.    Careful, your bias is showing!

Or they can be both? Family court is fucked up in more ways than one. 

On the first part I get it, I was arguing on why a court can issue an order for a paternity test. They cannot know the dude was harassing her, and I have no idea what evidence there was from either side (the article doesn’t specify).

For the father to remain with the kids (not the mother) he needs to first know they are his kids. If he isn’t told and he learns of it later, he can pursue a paternity test. I don’t know how this whole thing came to be and the article doesn’t specify, I am just saying that this is the general concept of a court

The mother doesn’t get to make that choice. Otherwise I could walk in a hospital, pick up a kid, call it mine and leave. Since we assign children biologically to mothers we should treat fathers the same.

Because the court ordered it and it’s obviously an important piece of information they wanted to make a ruling.