Can you not SEE how edgy they are?
(Me either. Flag them.)

It’s wild how the person you’re responding to doesn’t understand that “but it’s okay because they DESERVE it” is exactly what rape apologists believe. They just draw the line at who “deserves it” differently.

That’s a wack-ass definition of “puritanical”.

I think people would be less annoyed about the “fantasy for certain tastes” if he just admitted that’s what it is, instead the juvenile pretense that there is a good solid reason for the “fantasy” that will make people “ashamed” when they hear what that reason is. 

“Other car manufacturers are also terrible” is not really an excuse, is it?

Rather than a recap of the patch notes I’d be interested to see an article at least alluding to what the new content is. I don’t want to wander all over the map again trying to figure out whether and where these ‘secrets’ might be found.

Yes, I understand that, but it’s not a magic loophole. It’s the same issue: they’re changing their agreements in order to retroactively charge people for something that was not part of the pre-existing agreement. 

So they’re going to charge for installs that were done under a previous agreement, using the terms of a new agreement? I wouldn’t want to be defending that one in court.

I wonder how they think they’re going to enforce this retroactively.

Friend, I’m also old and losing track of the hip slang the youths are using, but I recommend not getting furious about it.

Spot on. A bunch of pixels being extra gay at him is just like real-life sexual harassment and assault, in his mind.

Wrong. The child could be adorable.

Don’t forget the violation of consent decrees!

You’re responding to someone who is angry that a campus meal service is producing food that the students like to eat. Logic is not going to get past his irrational hatred of young people.

The lawsuit explains all of this and claims that ITAR doesn’t prohibit hiring asylum-seekers or refugees for the positions at issue. 

You are literally commenting on an article about a car company hiding a safety workaround in its software, and acting surprised that anyone is skeptical of the safety claims of self-driving car companies?

Try studying more than three dozen people even!

Your link to the study is completely broken, it just contains the lead author’s name instead of a URL.

According to the complaint, ITAR doesn’t prohibit them from hiring asylum seekers or refugees.

The complaint (linked below, Kinja willing) walks through this and claims that ITAR does not in fact prohibit hiring asylum seekers or refugees.