willywanker84681
CaptainFabulous
willywanker84681

Yes, we will do that on the same day that anyone gives a shit about what you think.

The thing is that you totally could - you're just putting a barrier down that doesn't really exist. As much as people opposed to equal rights want to pretend that same gender relationships are icky and "other" the fact is that our relationships are EXACTLY the same as mixed gender couples.

We sit at home on the sofa

I'm pretty sure all you would have to do to write a convincing homosexual relationship is write a convincing heterosexual relationship, and then go through the text and change the gender specific words. You might want to avoid writing too much about sex, but there are ways to get around that.

Why would it be hard to write a same sex relationship? They are the same as any other, two consensual people wanting to live their life with each other, so just write what you know and it should be just the same. (Not criticising you by the way, just had a similar conversation recently and they struggled to write

There are really two distinct safety issues: one of which is total nonsense and one of which is, I think, worth careful consideration. The first issue is whether these GM foods are unsafe for humans to consume. Of course not. What we call corn has been genetically modified over thousands of years; genetic mutations

I never saw his sexuality as particularly relevant, other than everyone he loves gets hurt or cursed or possessed or fucked up in some way. If there was a way of portraying his pansexuality without making it at all relevant, then I guess that would be cool.

More on topic, Constantine's sexuality is one of the few concrete things I knew about him, having never read the comics. Making him queer would really give the show at least one interesting hook, even if we're forgetting everything else that makes the character stand out.

Using free speech and being deprived of life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness because your opinion isn't popular certainly isn't much of a defense of free speech. The company can do whatever it wants of course, he was stupid to use his name which is connected to a company, but I really don't think it should be

This is a good example of why anonymity is so important on the internet for protecting free speech.

Of course you would. You're a woman. Women have a thing for ugly guys who make them laugh. You would never ever watch a movie with the fat chick from Bridesmaids getting it on with Ryan Gosling though.

'Ted' made tons of money.

And yet, after three box office failures, MacFarlane still gets money to make movies.

If you don't like Seth MacFarlane, there's something wrong with you.

I can for the life of me see why anyone wants to do something much different than this.

Now playing

The Sarah Scott pictures do help as it's so easy for us comic buffs to forget that classic costumes can look completely ridiculous in real life (see Hawkman or Stargirl on "Smallville.") All of these are good and such and in real life, I can see pants rather than shorts being better look. Then again, it's hard to

From what I read on line he has a green sock on his package so that they could CGI the naughty bits out. They had to find a way to 'shrink' things a bit so that they would be peeking out here and there.

why did you even bother commenting?

Mmmmm... White Castle....

Guy was an old bigot, no question about it. But should this Olin guy be fired simply for expressing his opinion on the matter?