Who have always done so and didn't get into accidents until the cameras were put in place.

No. If they weren't causing accidents before then clearly an increase in accidents is due to the camera, and only the camera (and any yellow light shortening funny business that comes with them).

Not really, since in many cases they are shortening the length of the yellow light below the federally-regulated threshold in order to catch more people. So either you enter the intersection on the yellow and it changes because it's now 2 seconds instead of 3 and get tagged or you see yellow as you're approaching and…

No Shit, drivers say.

And risk getting an RD ticket even when you've done nothing wrong from a cop that's short on his quota that day? I don't think so. Just avoid Virginia, period.

How exactly is this NSFW? Because he says "fuck"? Otherwise there isn't a damned thing that goes on here that you wouldn't see on a daytime soap opera.

Corvette convertibles are nearly exclusively drove by old men or chicks that look like porn stars. Miatas are a close 2nd.

So basically, unless you're part of the Gawker inner circle there is no point in commenting about anything because your comments will never been seen. Good to know; I won't bother anymore.

You think a penis is weird??? Have you ever taken a good long look at a vagina? Those things are positively terrifying! Like something out of a Lovecraftian nightmare.

And again, you're 100% wrong. Actions are NOT speech. Continuing to try and assert they are only makes you look foolish. Please stop while you're already behind.

I'm disputing what happened. I'm disputing that it shouldn't have. Yes, our currently laws allow an employer to fire anyone at anytime, including for things they say on their own free time, via their own personal accounts. And whether you believe it or not, it's wrong. It IS a free speech issue, one our Constitution…

Well, that's not really true. He posted it from his personal twitter account, not an account given to him by his employer. The topic had nothing to do with his employer, or in any way related to them or their industry. What he said and the way he said it had absolutely no bearing on the company, and whether or not…

Yeah, I have to disagree. It's always easy to filter out the bullshit. And if a news source published an article by an anonymous author/reporter that turned out to libelous then the newspaper would be on the hook, so I don't see how that's a concern. In most cases of libel or slander there is almost always a money…

You are referring to the free speech clause of the 1st Amendment. I was referring to the idea and concept of free speech in general. I'm fully aware that the 1st Amendment only protects one's speech from government censure. I was addressing the concept from the standpoint of the OP who says this is the reason why…

But the core essence of free speech is that, by design, it's intended as protection to allow you to say things that are unpopular. That's the whole point. You don't need "free speech" if what you're saying is the norm, and what everyone else finds acceptable.

Well when you buy the commercial "natural" peanut butter that separates they say that refrigeration retards the separation. But I'm with you, I don't put my PB in the fridge.

There is a health food store across the street from me that has a peanut grinder for fresh on-the-spot peanut butter. The price fluctuates, but so far it's never gone above $2.39 a pound. The only downside is that it's unsalted, so I usually have to add a bit myself when I get home. And unlike the "natural"…

Yes, like the "malware" extensions that let you download YouTube videos. This is so stupid. Guess it's time to switch to the dev channel build. I expect this kind of behavior from Apple, but not "do no evil" Google.

White?!?!?!? Seriously??? Bitch's dress should have been charcoal grey.

Unfortunately you only get something like 10 minutes to edit before it's there for good.