No, I think you're going to see quite a backlash like we did with Man of Steel. Normal people who, when they think of Wonder Woman instantly think Lynda Carter, are going to be scratching their heads looking at this ridiculous costume that to them looks nothing like Wonder Woman, and thinking, WTF is this shit? Just…

I dunno, Lynda Carter looked pretty damned convincing in her "combat lingerie". And Christopher Reeve looked pretty awesome in his brightly-colored highly-faithful costume. So this notion that superhero costumes have to look "realistic" and be all muddy colored is pretty silly.

Do you not see the girly man in his flesh colored tights, panties, beaded belt, and ballet slippers on the right? Oh so masculine! I wish they had gone with that look when they redesigned Superman's outfit. Tho the tassel belt would have worked nicely too.

Wow, you're a bitter little misogynist, aren't you? I stand by my statement that her costume is based on Greek armor because anyone with eyes can see that it was. Again I refer to Xena's outfit. What's the difference between her's and WWs? shoulder straps, some leather skirt flaps, and, well, that's about it. Yet no…

But look at that bathing suit bottom! You'd NEVER see that on a male superhero! I mean, they took away Superman's panties for that very reason, cause it made him look all girly and feminine. And hair all dressed up in an updo like that? I mean, com'n now, when have you ever seen Superman in an updo? I'm sorry, but…

So again, it revolves around not being impractical, but being "too sexy". Are you sure you're not 14? Her costume was created in 1941, certainly not a time of hedonism. If no one had issues with her bustier then I do not see why anyone should have issues with it now. Perhaps the real issue is not the costume itself,…

OMG her legs and arms are showing! Hardly practical. Way too sexualized. Try again.

So your objection isn't really that her bustier is "impractical" so much as its "too sexy"? Did you miss the part about her costume being nearly identical to those worn by Greco-Roman soldiers, who, last time I checked, weren't trying to be sexy?

Pretty much all superhero costumes are completely impractical for combat. If you get rid of the bustier top you might as well get rid of Batman's cowl (zero peripheral vision) and his and Superman's cape (totally impractical for fighting and/or flying — it would certainly be nothing but a hindrance, constantly getting…

Which works in the comics, but on-screen I think would be weird. Which is why on the TV show Hippolyta was always played by an older actress. And Lynda despite being almost 63 certainly doesn't look it. If they wanted to shave a few years off to make her look 40-ish it would be easy to do digitally in post production.

The only problem with casting Lynda as Hippolyta (which of course would be amazing) is that she'd only highlight how not-Wonder Woman-looking Gal Gadot is. You can't have mom look more like Wonder Woman than your Wonder Woman.

It's horrible. It's broken in so many ways it's ridiculous. There is not a single thing about that costume that is Wonder Woman. The entire book, including the art, is a hot mess that will go down in history as one of Wonder Woman's most retarded periods, right up there her Emma Peel stint from the early 70s.

Or, y'know, we can go with one that works and is true to the comics. You cannot improve upon perfection.

There is a health food store across the street from me that has a peanut grinder for fresh on-the-spot peanut butter. The price fluctuates, but so far it's never gone above $2.39 a pound. The only downside is that it's unsalted, so I usually have to add a bit myself when I get home. And unlike the "natural"…

Yes, like the "malware" extensions that let you download YouTube videos. This is so stupid. Guess it's time to switch to the dev channel build. I expect this kind of behavior from Apple, but not "do no evil" Google.

White?!?!?!? Seriously??? Bitch's dress should have been charcoal grey.

Interestingly enough they also had to play with color to get them to "read" right on color TVs too. For example, I remember reading that the "white" trim on Jeannie's costume was actually either a pale pink or pale blue, and not white, as white got burnt out due to the lights. Also as film stock ages the colors…

Well this issue is an old one. Black and white photos have been retouched and colorized for over a century. And it's really no different than colorizing black and white TV shows and movies, which of course is heresy as far as I'm concerned.

Well that's really the core of it. One giant hardcover book for $50 is not bad. But 3 for $50 each is ridiculous.

Unfortunately you only get something like 10 minutes to edit before it's there for good.