Yeah, that one baffled me. Were they just unable to cast him or something? He’s kind of an optimal movie character!

One question. Is there still that same excessive emo-time that the anime had?

It’s mostly cultural training. Most of us see the same movies and shows and there’s a very consistent theme where men chase and women protect. Over and over again that’s all we see.

No chance that we have two bad actors here? Eh?

Well, Brady most probably cheated, but Goodell honestly has been so inconsistent he’s actually making Brady look good.

I love ripping on NFL as much as the next guy, but the reason why none of these arguments are going anywhere is because to a neutral observer (or one that fights against their own bias) it’s pretty obvious that BOTH sides were behaving in ways that were kind of awful and attacking one often looks suspiciously like…

Her dad and her whole money team are going to want her to sign one, of course. But Taylor just thinks the whole topic is so distasteful — they’ll be fighting her on it.

But skeets are fuckers!

Hollywood star dates regular human instead of other Hollywood star?

I like the cut of your jib, sir!

Well, if we’re looking for ‘driving them crazy’ points we could go all out and get an indigenous hawaiian transgender former spy with a lot of body art that shoots skeet with a handgun and gets around on a segway.

Unfortunately, Brady never got the message because he was busy having his computer destroyed because his wife saw him surfing porn.

Given that he ‘destroyed’ his phone right after being asked about the texts and it came back to bite him, that’s a pretty dicey game for Brady to play.

Nonetheless, it takes a very special person to ‘destroy their phone’ right after having a conversation about those very texts.

Would anybody else here destroy their cell phone and make sure everything is missing right after being asked about those texts?

Now I really miss Front Page Sports football.

The worst thing about this whole ordeal is that there’s some pretty obvious aberrations in the data and while it was pointed out (some Sharp guy who does some football analysis) and the fundamental question (Did something abruptly change that gave the Patriots a competitive advantage in away games that did not follow…

This is why amateurs are dangerous with data. They often suffer from severe bias, and aren’t disciplined enough to fight their own dissonance.

Again, you did not answer my short question. Why do you credit the debunking? Do you believe it of superior quality?

Well, now -I- am curious as to why you think one analysis is vastly superior to the other?