The way people get treated these days you’ve got to wonder if there was also a part of her that couldn’t handle the idea of bringing somebody into this world who’s destined to commit the crime of Driving While Black or something even more heinous.
The way people get treated these days you’ve got to wonder if there was also a part of her that couldn’t handle the idea of bringing somebody into this world who’s destined to commit the crime of Driving While Black or something even more heinous.
Can we actually use mice and keyboards on consoles now?
So you’re not curious about the reality and just want to nitpick an analysis.
I think I can say things a little shorter! (I hate making people read too much and that was a bit rambly)
And now you’re doing the SAME THING.
Egads! Look at those wings flex!
So, you care less about the reality behind the data than whatever you want to believe?
I should probably say things better, because part of the reason I’m ticked off is they were so caught up in trying to defend what their team did wrong that they completely missed what they did right. I don’t think this is nearly as dramatic as everyone as making out as the cheating side either.
The statistics behind the Sharp analysis aren’t fundamentally flawed in any way. There’s barely any statistics to LOOK at. It’s a massive outlier on the timeline and it’s really weird to NOT be focused on that instead of trying to find some specific thing (like inflation) to treat like the whole answer. Outside in,…
The ‘Hackneyed bullshit statistics’ are the ones put out by the guys doing the debunking.
Just as an FYI, this actually shows up as the first search for a lot of ‘Brady/patriots/fumble/stats’ type searches and the headline is COMPLETELY incorrect!
And no corrections on the puppies!
*nervously*
Annnnd....Dogmate?
You can romance your companions, regardless of whether you play as a male or female. Not clear on whether or not this includes robots like Mr. Handy, but here’s hoping.
It is kind of surreal that we have a system that puts people in charge who consistently make bad decisions but are sociopaths enough to lie sincerely about it, isn’t it?
This is true. We would see a great uptick in the use of the word ‘Curmudgeon’ :)
Still giggling. That was awesome.
That’s because he’s far better than any of our last candidates have been, he’s doesn’t deceive, he’s sincere, and he’s often correct.
Are you sure we’re talking about the same person???
Yeah, he didn’t belong on this list, he’s the only politician in either major party that I’d trust my kids with.