What I’ve wondered is could Sony get an injunction on Kesha’s behalf. After all, it’s Sony’s millions that were invested in her not Luke’s. Would a judge be much more likely to grant an injunction with Sony backing it? Up to this point they’ve sided with him. But they’re coming under pressure to cut ties to him. If…

I wonder if they consider themselves to be fiscal conservatives.

There’s been a big improvement in many social problems forcing conservatives to create new things to be fearful of.

I looked up the state of limitation for defamation and its only one year. Would he be able to get away with doing this?

I bet if a respected indie artist did a song like The Harold Song Deconstructed you’d say its a great song. You think its bad just because you have a bias against Kesha.

Electronic songs make up less than half of her discography. But even some of her electronic songs like Bad Dream, Blind and Lover are fantastic songs.

Kesha is very talented. She comes from a musical family and spent years training as a songwriter. She was writing songs for TV shows when she was just 15 and has been mentored by a lot of writers and producers over the years. Luke has definitely been wasting her talent but some great songs still end up on her albums.…

You left out Wonderland, which lyrically is so interesting now that we know how terrible things have been behind the scenes. When the album came out I thought it was odd that a 25 year old would write a song like that. It sounds more like something a 40 year old missing their youth would write. Her Deconstructed EP…

I think she had little choice. She’s also accusing Luke of forcing her to sign contracts under duress. When she signed on the dotted line in 2005 it was really over for her. He owned her at that point. From what I understand Luke also apparently lied on that deposition in 2011, which we’ll find out if this case go to…

In her lawsuit it says he threatened her. That full deposition has never been unsealed but other people who were deposed said Kesha had told them about the rape over the years. So she’d been telling people about it.

Not at all. When she was 18 and had little income she would have considered going to the police to report a millionaire very risky. So it makes sense she chose not to do it.

He would be calling all the shots in her career. She needs to fight for 100% separation from him. Also imagine how bad it would look during the trial if she went back to working for his label.

To be fair, she’s made two major rulings in Kesha’s favor in this case. She seems pretty unbiased.

They made a mistake. She didn’t sign with him again because she didn’t have to. The original contract was always in effect. She did sign with Sony in 2009.

You mean when she was completely under Luke’s control and allegedly making financial and physical threats against her. Obviously being rich doesn’t mean a lot in abuse cases. She’s got money and yet is still struggling to get out from under this guy’s suffocating control.

Kesha is her real name. Her pronunciation of it is Russian in origin. Kesha is an African, Indian and Russian name.

Dr. Luke is the head of her record label. They never offered to let her move to another label. The producer offer is basically dishonest to trick people like you into think they’re reasonable and she’s unreasonable.

She accused him of rape in 2005 yet he worked with her for years after that. So yes he did want to work with her after the rape allegation. If you look at the history between she’s desperately been trying to escape him since 2005 and he’s insisted on maintaining control over her.

She wasn’t a multimillionaire when the rape is said to have happened in 2005. LOL.

It’s a myth she signed with him a second time. She’s been tied to him since 2005 by the same contract. She signed to Sony in 2009. She went to a lawyer in 2005 and asked for help getting out of her contract citing rape and abuse. Lawyers worked for two full years from 2006-2008 to free her from the contract. They…