Why on Earth should *safety* features be designed around the *most* durable people?

You’re not making the point you think you’re making.

This is like arguing that because eggs are fragile, there’s no reason to bother building better egg cartons and we should just expect them to break on the way home from the store.

No, it’s sheer apathy. Very common, actually. They just don’t think of us in the first place.

And if there just aren’t any...?

...Is your point here “women are just more fragile”?

Uh...wouldn’t that be all the MORE reason to build around them? JFC.

I don’t know what contradiction you’re seeing here.

I mean, considering all of those might be nice, instead of none?

No one argued with you there, but you seem to really want someone to be wrong so you can belabor this point.

Spend half the time you’re spending defending the manufactures yelling at the NHTSA.

Yeah, real “spoiled” to expect the “perfection” of...being considered.

The. Standards. Were. Designed. Around. Male. Averages.

So what exactly do you do if you’re a driver below 5'? 🤔

“Now go tell your mom how you totally kicked some dude’s ass on the internet so you can find some shred of self respect.” You said it, not me.

“I’d explain further, but too bad: it’s not MY job to placate your idiotic whinging either. Nice try on getting the last word also, you dolt.” What? I don’t understand how you think conversations work. One person says something...and then the other does. Are you not supposed to make yourself understood? Was I not…

“Literally every complaint you have is that YOU don’t get something. That’s your stupidity, not my lack of argument.” You don’t understand how communication works, do you?

“There’s an article about it right above us, you utter moron.” Yes. Yes there is. Your point?

Again, it’s not my job to make YOUR argument for you,…

If you’re asking that, yes.

Dude, that is a lot of fucking words. Are you OK?

We don’t usually prove the existence of something by citing examples that failed. You gave precisely two. One you literally ceded to me didn’t apply, or, *if we already assume that you’d proved the existence of cancel culture*, “failed.” (BTW, you don’t seem to…

“Hey, I know you’re closed, but can I just come in anyway?”

I literally did quote it.

I wasn’t aware having moral discernment was bad now, that explains a lot. “Some things are more vile than others” is apparently controversial now. OK.

“The goalposts that got moved, oh oblivious one, are the ones where you claimed Roseanne would rather bloviate on Twitter than work. That…

I’m confused. An example that you literally ceded didn’t apply...proves me wrong???

Not sure how “never said anything vile about someone” is the criteria for criticizing something *as vile as what Roseanne said,* but also not sure why you can’t believe it would be possible for someone to just *not* be vile to other…

Dude, your examples were bullshit and now you’re stomping and claiming it doesn’t matter because it IS TOO a real thing! That’s not how making a case for something works.

“Cool, so we can stop complaining about Trump’s border wall!” Wat.

I can quite confidentially say I’ve never said anything like Roseanne said, no.…

...Kevin Hart literally has movies coming out right now, is on the cover of magazines, is making money left and right. He was “canceled” for about two weeks.

Come on.

The only reason Roseanne hasn’t come back is that she’d rather scream on Twitter forever instead.

And yeah, it does actually make a difference if someone…

I think the informality here lends itself to dark humor—the headline is funny precisely because it’s an impossibly morbid thing to be casual about. Which seems consistent with house style.