...You realize you’re only making this worse, right? Why are “original occupants” and “most basic, widespread aspects” somehow opposites?
I think you meant well with your original comment but you’re revealing some ugly assumptions while digging in.
...You realize you’re only making this worse, right? Why are “original occupants” and “most basic, widespread aspects” somehow opposites?
I think you meant well with your original comment but you’re revealing some ugly assumptions while digging in.
There wasn’t.
There wasn’t.
No, she WANTS attention and believes she’s entitled to it. That’s not the same as a “need” or a mental illness. It’s really not.
If she weren’t white she’d have learned by now you can’t do things like this because the consequences for it would not have been nice.
She didn’t have a “false impression.” She at no point believed someone grabbed her butt because, um, that didn’t happen, and what did happen wouldn’t give anyone that false impression.
I mean, yes, unfortunately 9-year-olds who might grope people do exist, but that’s kinda irrelevant here.
Yeah, she “commonly” does it because she’s a busybody and a racist, and she’s thus far gotten away with it. Someone could only assume she “sounds mentally ill” if they’ve never met such people, I guess (or anyone actually disabled by mental illness, for that matter, who tend to have entirely different behavior…
Why think they’re sick instead of just jerks who want to make everything about them and have thus far gotten away from it? That’s not “sickness,” it’s privilege.
No, she’d be a person who learns she can’t get away with entitled, racist behavior. There’s literally no reason to assume she doesn’t or can’t know better here.
Luckily, you don’t have to choose because mentally ill people don’t “get people killed,” entitled people do that.
You might also want to look up the rate of police murders of mentally ill people, most of whom are also black, with their mental illness often openly used as an excuse for why deadly force was necessary.
That’s kinda my point, yes. Take it up with the person looking for an explanation of why she didn’t “assume it was accidental.”
I think you somehow left out the relevant panel...
What are you even talking about.
I mean, she knows it didn’t happen on purpose OR by accident, because a backpack hitting your butt and someone *grabbing* your butt feel nothing alike. Her problems are a bit deeper than being mistaken.
That’s unfair to pigs.
The very fact that all dogs are cute is kind of integral to the concept.
“You seem entirely out of touch with reality” isn’t actually supposed to mean “you expect something better than currently expected.”
That...doesn’t make the question make more sense?
Why does anyone have to “get realistic”? No one’s obligated to support a company for doing less than bare minimum because “at least it was something.”
Then...you already bought it? I’m not sure what the point of your question is.
Sure it’s realistic. They could literally just do it. They aren’t because they’re choosing not to.