...You know that how?

Oh, no! How dare someone have standards! :O

You seem nice.

I think they got that.

“But, but...why can’t you just leave people high and dry if it’s technically legal???”

Imagine thinking your city is the ONE city in America without racist police shootings. IMAGINE.

You know, the thing is that even if you hate every single thing about The Last Jedi, *this would be absolutely terrible storytelling.*

...Is that supposed to be some brilliant observation? Wow, amazing, a professional writer writes for money! Is that supposed to be sinster now?

You don’t have to be “out to get” anyone because it hasn’t occurred to you to give it a second thought, that’s the point. You’re coming in here and making it all about your feelings because how could it NOT be?

It’s amazing how he read this whole article and is still managing to center his thoughts around white people.

You’ve listed a bunch of things that have nothing to do with the crime or what his thoughts and feelings must have been *as a victim of that crime.* In all the coverage, he’s been an object acted upon. Try again.

“Bruh, when you ask a person on the street what a ‘mass shooting’ is, they’ll most often say something like columbine/parkland/DC Sniper.” *That is the entire point of the article.* That is not factually unknown; it’s exactly what’s being *objected to.*

1) WTF is a “game squabble”? 2) It’s interesting how you assume “true mass shootings” are only committed by “nutjobs.”

“If a group of race/gender/insert-term-here shoots another group of race/gender/insert-term-here, I assume that is due to gang/vendetta/family issues, and view it differently.” Why do you assume that? 

How do you know this shooting wasn’t indiscriminate? Waiting for you to tell me.

“There was more than one shooter” obviously doesn’t indicate that, or the DC Sniper(s) wouldn’t count, right?

So fuck their families and communities, right? I mean, why worry about anyone dying, if this is how you’re thinking?

You have no idea what the intent was here. You’re making assumptions based on...well, I won’t make assumptions about what you’re basing them on.

What makes you think the victims weren’t random? What makes you think the shooters were gang members? What makes you think gangs never shoot random people?

How are you defining “each other”? All you know is that there was more than one shooter. Are you assume all seven people shot were also shooters? If so, why?

You said elsewhere you assume gang shooting when there’s more than one shooter. Do you not know the DC Sniper case, are you being willfully dense, or is this really not quite about the number of shooters?