Valid point. Rationality, facts, and logic don’t seem to play a role for many of his supporters. I mean, the guy lacks substance on every single issue, which is why he resorts to hyperbole/name calling so often. If you can’t debate the issues, make fun of those who can. This is the product of the disturbing trend of…

That’s what happens when people start making absolutist opinions on economics, when they don’t understand the concept even slightly.

“Obama could’ve used our treaties with those countries to forcibly stop these islands from being built. Instead, he’s ceded the South China Sea to China, no matter how many times we sail ships through there.”

My issue with President Clinton wasn’t that he had an affair. It’s that he lied about it, and played legal “phrasing” games instead of simply admitting fault, asserting his humanity, taking his punishment/criticism, and moving on. An affair is a matter between him, his wife, and their daughter. It’s certainly…

Clinton/Congress “balanced the budget” by implementing cuts to defense, and intelligence called the “peace dividend” that were just as poorly thought out, and damaging as the “sequester cuts” are now.

From my post:

This is such a dumb comparison, I can’t even believe you posted it.

“South Korea’s been preparing to do so for some time.”

“...think about the hysterics when Kim Jong Il died. Now imagine that multiplied by a factor of ten when they realize everything they’ve been taught for generations has been a complete lie.”

Honestly, it’s a flip-of-a-coin at this point.

Yeah, it’s going to be a lot more complicated than that.

Well, to be fair, Dear Leader III is kind of “reforming” his government by removing old officials, and executing them. It’s just how NK “reforms” things. Executions, trips to the gulag, purges, torture— you know, fun for the whole family. Then they bring in new people, and boom, “reformed.”

I have a feeling the A-10 isn’t going away anytime soon, as long as current conditions in the ME persist. It’s really the perfect aircraft to use for CAS, and airstrikes in general, in environments where your enemy is unsophisticated, doesn’t possess SAMs or even MANPADS, and doesn’t posses it’s own air force. I think…

All that obfuscation to hide that you fabricated an entire issue, and cannot walk it back.

Very cool! Thanks for sharing! It’s like having a front row seat to history, huh? And it figures, the one time you don’t want to have any maintenance issues—you get the hand signal from the pilot. Haha! I’m sure it’s more humorous now, then it was then. That probably called for a few cold ones when you got home...

Cite proof, or no?

“I think he is annoyed by ISIS and has to be on constant guard because literally every word choice he uses is being data mined to use against him for partisan purposes.”

I told you— Cite posters besides yourself making that distinction, and we’ll go from there.

All I ask is for you to cite the posters making that distinction, besides you.

Another fabrication. No I didn’t. I asked you to cite posters here making the argument that Saudi Arabia’s use of cluster bombs in cities was “good/acceptable”, who were now saying Russia’s use of cluster booms in cities was “bad/unacceptable”. Each time you’ve to cite a single poster making that distinction.