While I agree soemwhat that Iran would be a better choice for an ally in the region— the thought is also more of a fantasy than reality.
While I agree soemwhat that Iran would be a better choice for an ally in the region— the thought is also more of a fantasy than reality.
“Got money out the ass?”
Exactly.
It’s certainly possible. However, after the civil uprisings that had to be put down with extreme amounts of force after Ahmadinejad’s reelection that was flat-out rigged by the hardliners, and the “green revolution” during the Arab Spring— the Supreme Leader has been fairly strict with the hardliners, keeping them on…
True.
We’ll certainly see.
The “world’s worst terrorists” aren’t held at GITMO, or it’s “Camp X-Ray.” And they haven’t been for a while.
I’d think bringing back the F-117 would be a “under worse case scenario only” type move; like if we needed to drastically augment our stealth forces in a very short timeframe.
And then devolves into a critique of grammar and use of italics...
An “intellectually sheltered life”, huh?
Please, anyone who believes the total nonsense spewed by RT, Press TV (Iran), Sputnik, or our own Infowars— needs to “learn how to think”, son.
Valid point.
No, it’s not illegal to kill foot combatants during a war with airpower. If they don’t surrender, they’re fully authorized targets.
“Those Iraqi soldiers were given a new lease on life by the only people that could have.”
“It was mass butchery of a pathetically incompetent foe that solved absolutely nothing”
Why would civilians be in a military convoy— a convoy fleeing the country that said military had invaded, and now was being pummeled for it?
You hurt your credibility when you cite “RT”, aka Kremlin funded Russian propaganda, as a source to back up your point.
I think he’s 3rd from the left, front row.
You’re telling me to seek help, while asserting 9/11 was an inside job?
Yeah, didn't think you wanted to get into that debate, comrade.