We can do both. We should do both. I.e., without affordable housing, where are those cured* going to stay anyway?

So we take New York City’s homeless, drop them off in Juarez, have them cross ‘illegally’ (*wink, wink*), Abbott busses them back to NYC and Adams now finds shelter for them.

It’s for vegetarian-curious or the i-know-better-but-adding-meat-is-just-first-nature-to-me crowd like all the rest.  That’s more why they’re not worried about cross contamination, it’s not really for vegans.

Above: somehow better than daring to whisper the word ‘defund’

Huh.  Must’ve confused it with the gross then.  I had about 6 tabs open at the time

Boxofficemojo, but I ended up sorting by ‘in year total’ so Terminator and Abyss are slotted even lower than that when you add in December releases

I’ll give Avatar this. When I watched it in IMAX 3D, during one of the bits where the seed pods blow around everywhere, I ended up catching one floating down, down...

I’d add Christopher Nolan to that otherwise very short list.

Ahh...because that counts what they earned in 1987 (year end releases, the both of them.) Turns out my chart only counted what was earned in 1986 proper.

5th*

I don’t believe Aliens did that well at the box office compared to the rest of his films.

What ‘excuse’? Silver literally has no power to remove Sarver. At -best- it’d take the other owners to push him out. Silver’s barely Gabriel here while Sarver is God.

Something something freedom something

But does it offer advice?

Children don’t have 80s nostalgia...

Literally what would the Cowboys have to lose? 

The Little Women list misses the movie that tried a modern take from 2018. Which, at least, they -tried- something different, so more points for effort. That aside, it was solidly average.

Labor Day? At Disneyland? When it was 142F outside?

the fifth season, for instance, features 58-year-old Dominick West and 32-year-old Elizabeth Debicki as Prince Charles and Princess Di, respectively, which will likely place it somewhere in the mid-’80s

No no no, that’s just called being “fiscally responsible”!