veeteef
VeeTeeF
veeteef

Just give it to Netflix and relicense the movie back to them for another year. They would want it. 

Same reason when Disney plus came out they started censoring movies that had been around longer than most people that worked there. Once they censored the butt crack on the movie Splash.. I dropped my subscription. I do not need someone censoring things for me, I will be the one in my household to determine if

Hell, meanwhile on Twitter, Musk is unbanning wannabe nazis, antivaxers, Qanon leaders, insurrectionists, antisemites and white supremacists, and here YouTube’s freaking out over some “bad words”.

I can only speak for America, but the answer to your question is the same as why the vast majority workers don’t organize and fight for higher wages and unions. Or when they do there are massive lobbying efforts to crush them, and a political class that is at best lukewarm to organized labor if not openly hostile.

Because religion. Probably.

Can someone explain to me why we as a society even still have the concept of random words arbitrarily being designated as “swears”? I can understand slurs, but who was it who decided one day “ok no one should say ‘ass’ cuz it’s too naughty”? Kinda feels like if people just stopped caring about the “shocking impact” of

What’s even the point of having age-restricted videos then?

This is like the 8,716th time Youtube changed a policy that messed with creators in a negative way, and the 8,716th time creators kind of...made a little fuss about it but then well eventually go back to normal.

I think the most damning part is only alluded to here.

If your video is demonetized for violation of these rules, you will not be told why or how your video is in violation of the guidelines, only that it is. At that point you can edit your video and apply for re-review, still not knowing what was actually in

Well, take the last position for example, the Associate Quality Engineer. If you’re currently making or expecting to make $300k as a Quality Engineer, why would you waste your time applying for an entry level position like an AQE? If you’re hiring for that role and your only open Quality position is indeed this entry

WiFi Quality Engineer is an entry-level position that requires at least two years of experience

I said above that some of them may even be “low” once you take into account cost of living and income taxes (CA being one of the higher states). That $280k top end of the first job listed would probably be more like $215k top end in Austin.  Using a salary comparison tool, it’s way off (though, I suspect that the COL

Those are smaller than I thought. The internet is always talking like a FAANG junior developer makes $300k. But good for the mail room and Meta intern! They make more money than me as an Engineer in north carolina.

But.....by posting a range that covers multiple tiers, that allows them to hire a solid candidate who is in the lower Tier over a mediocre candidate in the top tier. When I hire, I hire more on potential and team fit than I do on years of experience.......if you’re willing to learn, I can mentor you on the things you

But when the company posts the position, they know roughly what tier within a job family that position would fall into. Posting every available tier in a category is blatantly skirting the point of the law. If I were posting a “Software Engineering Team Lead” but posted the salary range of every leadership position

I’m all for salary transparency. At my first real job, I stumbled into the salary records of the company I worked at (in reports thrown in the dumpster behind the building no less). It really opened my eyes and showed me that you have to demand your value. But to do that, you have to know what the playing field looks

None of these seem way out of line. There are huge ranges, but that is likely the range for all tiers in that job family. For example, my job family range goes from $58k to $190k, but there are 6 tiers in that range based on your specific position. I do think Meta doesn’t pay as much as I would think based on the

In the past, Twitter staff have received up to $80,000"

Fits with some of his other companies. SpaceX, for example, has a reputation for using mostly new aerospace engineers and working them to burn-out in a few years, after which they move on to new companies with a good resume line and presumably more of a normal life. He doesn’t run companies that support much of a

I think it bears mentioning that “birth rate” concerns frequently end up falling into eugenicist, racist or xenophobic areas...