The thing is Jezebel has done worse stuff then the Gawker piece. Like posting images of a woman being raped. That has got to be the worst thing posted on any of the Gawker sites and Jezebel never apologized for it. Natasha is also the person that posted the sony execs Amazon wish or shopping list on Jezebel so I don’t…

I didn’t know what to expect Jezebel to say, either. Jezebel is awesome and I assumed they might say how homophobic and awful that the article was. Instead, they said this:

Emmy people, this is how you play a snub:

I’m wondering how Natasha Vargas Cooper can justify being a sociopath.

Off-topic: Jezebel, I love you, but what the hell is going on at Gawker Headquarters? There needs to be a statement/apology for the David Geithner story. I feel dirty coming here now...

I really don’t get this sort of reaction. His income and prestige are based on ratings, ratings depend on your show of course but also on buzz. Once upon a time, being nominated for an Emmy created that buzz and a new show not getting a lot of nominations was a huge blow and a missed opportunity to have your cast…

No offense Lee Daniels, I love your show but Empire is to our generation, what Dynasty is to our parent’s. Sure you might have more sensical story lines and less wedding massacres but still, you’re a nighttime soap opera. Deal.

Canada also gave us Rush, Neil Young, Bryan Adams and Diana Krall, so stand the fuck up.

wait, who do we hate now?

She’s absolutely serious. A number of people who study mass murders say that the more infamy is generated, the more the act appeals to other sociopaths, whereas anonymity, being the opposite of what these people want, minimizes the risk of copycats.

Responding off the cuff, having not seen the video: it doesn’t matter what your job is, if you do it every day there comes a point when it’s just...commonplace. Doesn’t matter if you work for a women’s health clinic or a call center or as the President’s security detail, at some point the shine wears off and you can’t…

Okay, first of all, I get what this lady is saying but if I ever needed an abortion I would much prefer the tone of whoever is talking to me about it to be “casual”. It’s just a medical procedure, it doesn’t need to be a harrowing and incredibly serious discussion.
I get why she feels the need to apologize, but I don’t…

I’m pretty sure I’m in love with you. This response is truly amazing. And I agree with every word of it.

Not helpful? Like she’s really going to change these idiots’ minds anyway?

For what? There was a paper just last year showing that if we can get more people to smoke, it’ll help us work out our social security numbers. You’ll die, and that will mean more money for care elsewhere. That’s helpful. They’ve been worried about increased life spans and quality of life from dwindling tobacco use.…

Eh. Sorry to be a Debbie Downer, but I’ve gotten to see some of the ways that people die, and I wouldn’t pick lung cancer. It tends to metastasize the the brain, and the things it does in there are not fun. *sad trombone*

GUYS I QUIT.

Gawker is mocking you publicly:

If you guys can’t stop bickering I WILL TURN THIS INTERNET RIGHT AROUND