Well, in this case I would consider the casing in his rental car and joint at the scene of the crime to be a bit more than circumstantial...or at least, I wish there was a better word for this kind of evidence, where - literally - the only other conceivable explanation involves a conspiracy enacted by unknown parties.
unfortunatelylostburner2
unfortunatelylostburner2
It is what it is. Heh the fact is, I can’t think of a practical, definitively superior alternative to a trial by jury. I can think of plenty of laws that I’d like to change, but the trial process itself? I got nothing, aside from maybe working harder to bring in jurors from farther away when we’ve got a high profile…
It’s not like direct evidence or eyewitness testimony is demonstrably less fallible.
They had physical evidence. They had a shell casing in his rental car that just-so-happened to match the make of the weapon used against Lloyd, and appeared identical to the casings from the scene. No, they may not have been able to definitively prove that they were fired from the same gun, but that’s still pretty…
Pretty much...but that's with you in the room, right? Maybe not staring right at him...but present.
The dipshits who accept this kind of thing are probably telling us more about who they are than they really intended to.
After three or four rounds I’d start trying to get Tom to tell me what the fuck went wrong with Chet. That seems like a recipe for disaster.
“I have seen people purchasing filet mignons and crab legs with their EBT cards,” he said. “When I can’t afford it on my pay, I don’t want people on the taxpayer’s dime to afford those kinds of foods either.”
I withdrew $7k a week ago. It took a 3 minute phone call.
Yeah, why not? Iran’s free to sanction anyone they want. Won’t accomplish much.
Ehhh. I’d quibble with the idea that Alibaba has nothing to lose if the US freezes its assets. Foreign stockholders don’t have a stake in the traditional sense, but much of the company’s value is in the perception that it’s going to continue to grow exponentially beyond China’s borders. The US freezing its assets may…
You’re equating Beijing and Putin in a manner that I really don’t think works here. You acknowledge that China will act in its own interests...as well it should, that’s what governments do.
I mean...no, I didn’t. That report is over two years old. State-owned vs state-contracted is a misnomer in China, where quite literally every functioning large-scale company is connected some way or another to the state.
...so this seems to be going over poorly. What exactly do most security experts propose the US Government do instead? Keeping in mind, of course, that the administration’s public statements of policy is obviously not going to be the full story. If you think backroom negotiations with China and the like aren’t still…
Same, since he said it's in his neighborhood. But I've never been to the Cambridge Bukowski's and if it's anything like the one off of Boylston that seems like a possibility. Deep Ellum isn't too far over the border, either.
It is rumored that a deluxe beer bar in my neighborhood runs an April Fool's meta-prank in which they advertise (on Twitter or whatever, I suppose) all the rare and exotic beers they have on tap for one day only, stuff that you just can't find in these parts.
So basically someone realized you could pipe the sideline / goalline feeds to TV stations and turn it into a source of revenue. That the backlash generated by their initial denial only increased fan interest in seeing the cameras implemented and raised its profile as a potential sponsorship target for certain…
Ohhh, you're an MRA Uber driver. Gotcha. Well then yeah, in your world that's definitely the simplest explanation. "She made it up" usually is.
"Wanna give a shout-out to my tire, my salad, my very best koala...CARL WERNICKE!