Actually, no. I did not originate that analogy on this thread. I defended it after you attacked it, but I did not bring up the bear, someone else did.

I am not bitching about religions killing people, you are. I am simply taking your argument (which is to blame the religion for every murder commitment by one of its followers) to its logical conclusion. It obviously doesn’t make sense, right?

I buried the lead there. You're admitting that Christians have killed WAY more than Muslims then right?

First, atheism isn’t a religion dumbass.

Is it possible that the Muslims who kill are also the weak of faith?

Nazis were Christians and Christians killed plenty in the Cold War.

Or did your dad/uncle fuck a Vietnamese girl once for money?

Or does that come from hunting Mexicans as part of the Minutemen?

Provided by Sean Hannity, I get it.

If I refer to Christianity as the religion where God raped a girl named Mary, would that be considered offensive?

The bear analogy wasn't actually mine. Someone else wrote it.

Christians have killed more religion than any other in the 20th century. Looks like the 21st will be the same.

Movie critics actually.

Wow, you must have a browser window open on Wikipedia! Graven images are different.

Yes of course, but to distill down a religion of over a thousand years to ‘moon rock worshippers’ is obviously meant to offend.

Better than it coming from Kirk Cameron movies, which is apparently your bible study.

To your bloodthirsty God?

Hahaha, you're better cultured but you are saying the largest religion on earth is a bunch of moon rock worshippers who are stuck in the seventh century. Yeah, you know culture buddy.

What have I said that is incorrect? Please be specific.

I think the point is, the bear wouldn't attack the human unless it had the stones thrown at him. Seems like you would preventively murder a dog simply because their is a chance, by your own actions, that the dog could possibly attack you. Am I reading that right?