twtc
Myrna Loy's Side-Eye
twtc

Instead of a madonna/whore dichotomy, I think Trump employs a fat pig/bimbo dichotomy. Kelly is not fat or ugly, and she’s not a bimbo because she keeps challenging him. At first, he was pissed that she was given permission to do so, but now that it’s clear FOX isn’t going to hide her away to appease him, she is now

Fox News standing up for Megyn Kelly now is like three months late. I wonder if they feel they can be belligerent because Trump had another debate canceled and those are big money makers for the networks.

A water sommelier, what hippy-dippy bullshit is this?

Were Crystal Skull problems really script-related. It seems to be they were more execution-related - superflous Lucas-y jokes (prairie dogs, vine-swinging), crappy, crappy CGI effects, and horrendous casting of Shia Labeouf. The only two things script related problems fans mentions have really been blown out of

The best sex I’ve had was with long term best friends. 10/10, would do again. Of course, I also didn’t sit around and never tell the other person my feelings. Nor did I wait till I was engaged to do all this.

Specifically this. He did the knee jerk reaction to the apple/fbi fight, then did the research, and changed his mind when he discovered he was wrong. He CHANGED HIS MIND when he was wrong! Do you know how much of a rare quality that is in a republican? Or a politician?

Yeah, he’s inspiring some grudging respect. I’m sure he’ll break all our hearts later though.

Between this and his* comments about Cruz

Not only is the game bad, the Slaughtering Grounds uses artwork taken without permission from the original artists and without crediting them. Frankly the deserve every amount of ridicule they get.

So when it’s content that Gawker Media wants to reuse, Reddit is okay. But the rest of the time it is a fetid hole of misandry, racism and neckbeards.

Facebook: 4Chan for your weird uncle and his pestilent political opinions.

Now playing

Here: Elizabeth Warren gave an amazing primer.

A lot of us are lawyers (as I’m assuming you are), so we also took Con Law. And no, advise and consent wasn’t held up as any sort of sacred cow like you’re making it out to be.

I wish reporters would ask every Republican...

Author here (IN THE GREYS). A couple points. First, then-Senator Obama’s support for a filibuster was based on his gripes with Justice Alito’s ideology. So far, it looks like any GOP filibuster would be based on...running out the clock on any nominee regardless of their beliefs. It’s OK for senators to disapprove of a

So...uh...I don’t want to be a pedant here, but “Supported the possibility of a filibuster” and “Actually filibustered” are two VERY different things.

Yup.

The most hilarious scenario is Republicans stop the nomination of a new Justice, Hilary wins and nominates Obama.
I’m pretty sure I’d die laughing.

If the Senate wants to filibuster a vote, fine, that’s a tactic that they can use if they feel it’s necessary. What’s not okay is not even holding hearings. The Senate should hold hearings with Judge Garland, and can then decide from there whether to vote no and/or filibuster him. That’s the scenario that you’re

Except they refuse to advise or consent thus leaving us with 8 justices for what could be well over a year with some very important cases coming up. The Senate not doing their job at all is not the same as the Senate valiantly keeping that crazy dictator Barrack Hussein Obama in check for us voters. We actually