I agree with you. But a student refusing to follow directions of teachers and administrators is not a day to day discipline situation. If everything about the story is correct, they only placed her under arrest as an absolute last resort.
I agree with you. But a student refusing to follow directions of teachers and administrators is not a day to day discipline situation. If everything about the story is correct, they only placed her under arrest as an absolute last resort.
Richland County sheriff Leon Lott has already spoken on the incident, telling WIS-TV, “The student was told she was under arrest for disturbing school and given instructions which she again refused. The video then shows the student resisting and being arrested by the SRO.”
Did you read the article you commented on?
It becomes a criminal matter when the student refuses to follow directions of teachers and administrators to leave the classroom. She was justifiably placed under arrest. She was not justifiably assaulted. Get it yet?
The original comment insinuated she wasn’t resisting arrest. She was resisting arrest. That’s all.
Non-compliance when being placed under arrest is resisting arrest.
The fact that you would insinuate that somebody is defending an adult assaulting a child based on the correction of the term “resisting arrest” says a lot about your reading comprehension.
Never said it did. But she was resisting arrest.
Oh so next time I’m arrested, I’ll just say no and everything will magically go away.
Did you read the story or just watch the video? She was asked to leave the classroom by the teacher and then an administrator and refused. The SRO asked her to stand and she refused, so she was placed under arrest. When she refused to be placed under arrest, she was resisting arrest, which was all my original point…
She was asked to leave the classroom by the teacher, an administrator, and then the SRO. I’m not justifying anyone’s actions, but she was, by definition, resisting arrest.
So...refusing to be arrested isn’t resisting arrest? Is that what you’re getting at?
It is, and always has been, a victimization dick measuring contest. Each side wants to seem sympathetic based on the number of threats they’re supposedly receiving.
People who still care about GamerGate in either direction are insufferable and not worth listening to.
She was being asked to stand up and refused.
What the cop did was excessive...but what should have happened here? Ask her nicely to stand up then walk away when she continues to refuse? Stand there and wait for her to stand up on her own?
Haven’t people gotten arrested for having The Simpsons characters in sexual situations?
Kaepernick is a good quarterback, but he’s not Rodgers or Brady. There are very few quarterbacks that can play well with a makeshift O-line, banged up RBs, and one competent WR.
They’re a progressive company that employs progressive people who make progressive games and still get ripped to shreds by progressive blogs like Kotaku that think they’re not doing enough to be progressive.
...sort of like how any journalist would interpret and write an article based on a press release from a company?