I bet he ended the call by saying he loves her 2000000.

It would definitely save on duct tape.

He doesn’t need to work, his parents are worth 2 million

Saying that it didn’t give them an advantage is a totally invalid argument, since they can’t prove this. Using an extra litre may have very well kept them ahead of Lewis in the end. They knew they were fuel-limited, because they instructed Seb to save at the end, and had him stop before reaching pit lane. If they…

I don’t love the Mazepin-bashing in general, but this is so good that you deserve all the stars.

It’s not as if someone keeps a gun at your head commenting on elitist F1 racing, so stop whining and quit if you don’t like it. Duh.

That’s true, of course. And I do believe that if you win a championship, you deserve it. But that doesn’t mean that everyone experiences the same type of luck throughout a season, and there’s no denying that Lewis has been extremely lucky so far.

Not for racing damage.

Yeah.. since it’s Spa, and it’s easy to overtake there, that would’ve probably been a better verdict. I do understand that the stewards are in a tough spot here: they are penalizing ‘by the book’ but deep down it doesn’t quite feel right given the issues that it’s caused in the title race.

Nothing happened at the front. They followed the action, I thought the coverage was perhaps the best it’s been all season.

It’s extremely unlikely that AM keeps second here. You simply have to be able to produce a 1 litre sample. While the fuel flow meter can indeed be an extremely accurate measurement for how much fuel has been used, that’s not its (main) purpose. They can’t use that theoretical number as evidence.

Yup, and if Merc and RBR keep on dancin’, Norris could steal one, too.

Fukc off

Russell hasn’t been summoned, he’s in the clear. Several drivers (incl. Ocon) reprimanded for procedure violations, but none penalized. Only AM’s appeal is now pending, everything else is now fixed.

We’ll probably lose Kimi next year, but we’ll likely add Russell.

Please. Six factual errors in one race report; the most crucial part of the race (Alonso’s defense) isn’t even properly explained; and an article riddled with typo’s and weird grammar. Why use ‘the latter of whom’ twice when you’re only talking about one driver?

If they had planned this, I’m sure Bottas would’ve cocked that up too and taken out Lewis or something. Obviously, just a mistake that cost RB dearly.

Not the first points of Russell’s career.

You were saying...?

Also, not Russell’s first points. And no mention of WHY Alonso’s defense was critical.