truffle-shuffle-triple-threat
truffle-shuffle BACK FROM THE DEAD
truffle-shuffle-triple-threat

This!! He may have given her chlamydia but it’s her stupid ass that was dumb enough to have unsafe sex with him enough times for him to give her chlamydia not once, but twice. Someone needs to grow the fuck up and start acting responsibly. Starting by using condoms! She’s lucky all she got was chlamydia.

Because she’s the more famous one. And because she seems to love the drama.

Why can’t it be both? Yes, they’re obviously assholes. But every single man she’s ever been with has been a crazy asshole. So yeah - and I say this as someone who for a long time dated different versions of the same man over and over again with the same results - the issue is also very clearly her choice of men. And

She just doesn’t learn, does she? I think, at some point, she needs to come to terms with the fact that she’s the common denominator in all her shitty dysfunctional failed relationships and learn to be alone.

Just saw your clarification so ignore the question I asked after reading your first comment.

Maybe I’m naive but I didn’t see that so much as an attack on her body as on the colour of her leggings which make them look like she’s not actually wearing anything? I had to look twice to realise she had anything on at all. She looks both naked and like she’s missing a butt crack.

Commie Liberal Pinko Lesbian Sluts

No, I’ve et to see anyone commend the Kardashians on their website. Rather, people ridicule the Kardashians for being famous for kim’s sex tape and Kris Jenner is basically her daughters’ pimp.

Actually the wording in the article was “After many years, my husband had finally figured out what he wanted to do with his life.” I’ll admit, I kind of had a similar thought reading the article. But mine was more in the vein of “girl, what are you doing having two babies with a man child who still hasn’t figured out

I think it’s easy to tell when a church and/or christian school is on the conservative side. Plus, it was in the contract they made him sign. I mean, really, telling people not to drink in public? That pretty much says it all.

This. I mean, my sympathies for going through such a shitty situation and I’m glad it all worked out but what the hell were you thinking accepting a job at such a conservative school? Even if you’re religious and want that to be a part of your career, join a progressive church and teach at a progressive religious

Question: is this woman even capable of making a good life choice?

“And, as you notice, her new stans on staff didn’t even TRY to question her on that. On to beauty tips and why you’re just SO fabulous!”

Maybe she should stop dating rappers with fucked up views of women then? Not saying non-rappers don’t cheat too but she certainly has a type and that type is “asshole rapper with mommy issues/madonna-whore complex” and so far they’ve all cheated and she seems to keep repeating that pattern.

No of course not. My point was that I could see how their publicists and lawyers could have talked him into settling quickly and for less than 50% and pushing the nanny rumour in the press to kill any rumours of his bisexuality.

And you don’t have to. But why try to shut them up just because you don’t agree? Why try to stop a university from inviting someone just because you don't like what they have to say?

They’re not worse. But you can’t deny that we live in a society where a man cheating on his spouse with another man makes for a bigger scandal than a man cheating on his wife with the nanny.

Politeness has nothing to do with it. Polite or not, the petition is an attempt to stop her from speaking at the university, thereby narrowing the diversity of views available. Why can’t they just criticise her views without calling for her not to be invited to speak? There are loads of people I think have outdated

Maybe so. But imposing that as the only acceptable view is just dogmatic militantism. What use is a movement that strived for equality for women of it doesn’t respect freedom of expression and the right to hold dissenting opinions? How is that any different than the oppression from the patriarchy that we’ve been

Universities are supposed to be places where ideas and views flow freely without fear of censorship, from either the government or ridiculous PC students who want to shut up everyone they disagree with. Sure, she’s an old with outdated views but why shouldn’t she be allowed to speak? Kudos to the university for not