Put this next to an X6 and then come back to us about “ugliest coupé”; likewise an X7 and “headlights too small in relation to the grille.”

It also had fewer mirrors, apparently.

We should nominate this for a COTD award.

Thanks to the inverse square law, that results in one-ninth the viewable area.

I don’t care if they’re useless, they’re just so far better-looking I’d rather never switch lanes.

The becht plache in the in United Chtates.

St. Loius, Colombia, and Kansas City

I don’t, and I won’t.

create an SUV nobody wants

I’ll join others in lauding the fantastic article. Just one minor thing, though:

Looking at these pictures, and from afar and the side, you could be forgiven for thinking this is a Type F.

Which is still a lot fewer times than people will make that tired joke.

Fragile mechanicals? From AMG?

What that other car could be

Counter-point: seats are made to recline for good reasons.

Rolls-Royce? Where?

Time was, Ferrari made a big show of having decided to limit production to under 7,000 car per years, to preserve “exclusivity”.

I loved that car. My mother had one back in 1983, and it’s the first car I drove.

IIRC, the glass was white but the bulbs were yellow. (I should be able to say for sure since my mom had one and it was great, but age is a bitch to memory.)

It’s so refreshing that tired old clichés are still so successful.