17 seconds? 17 years, more like.

Stroll’s presence will help steer the company toward its aim of becoming a luxury-goods company, [...] “The dialogue will change from automotive to luxury.”

And herre I was thinking Citroën was the first ever to pruduce vehicles with front-facing camera & screens, when in fact Morris beat them by 13 years! :-)

For such a well-designed car, the loom of the trunk badge is... amateurishly fucgly. Looks like some bought a GT 63 and then went to a gas station to buy the “S” to stick on it.

If you can’t leave social media alone for five minutes while boarding, I suggest you just stop flying, because it must be hell to be without for an entire flight.

You need more stars. This piece is so weird I haven’t the faintest why it ran. Every single of your three points would merit a star unto itself, with the one about leaving social media alone for five minutes deserving a dozen.

Not once in recent past have I seen someone scan the paper faster than someone with a phone.

I was jesting, of course, because one of the gems of this site is how much we can learn from comments (or laugh.)

So is safety, TBH. I wouldn’t want to be the dummy in a small-overhang test in this car.

She still drives her Range Vogue, at 93, and without wearing a seatbelt either.

COTD-worthy, if only for the belly laughs.

No stars?

Plus - not really needed in the UK anyway. Heater, yes; AC? Not so much. (1976 being before the “Chinese hoax” global warming, of course.)

I eat buttered eggs every morning now

Remember that Jalopnik article that mentioned most BMW buyers were ignorant of which wheels the engine on their car drove?

Given how ugly it looks in pictures, I am left to hope I’ll never see one in real life, then.

No.

The chief reason facelifts will almost necessarily look worse is that, good or bad, the original design was done as a whole, and trying to tack on something that is, by design, an afterthought is bound to mess things up.

Except that design does exactly the opposite.