Its vehicle was built to handle grueling, multi-hour runs around piping hot race circuits

Citroën, one of the most consistently weird carmakers ever.

Thanks to you, I’ll go to bed less stupid tonight, because until now I had no idea the Traction was actually called B11. I’m not sure I’ve once heard the car referred to by another name than Traction :-)

Just about any car is better than the Kicks, if only from the looks dept., TBH :-)

I saw that. I also saw that seat-belt-like contraption on the right seat, hence my puzzlement. (Center consoles can, like armrests, be folded away on some cars, though I’m of course not saying that’s the case here.)

Thanks, you’re too kind :-)

many LiveWire miles will be lived in cities

I agree with you on the naming, except we can’t go back, because same-displacement engines provide wildly different outputs nowadays, depending on model/whatever.

I had no intention of taking the X7 off-roading

I loved the original Juke, and this one I don’t hate, but you’d probably be disappointed by the 1L, 3-pot engine, and I very much doubt a lot of money went into making good seats in a $21K car.

That the Soul would outsell that insult to design that is the Kicks nearly 5-1 gives me hope we’ll pull through somehow.

What impresses me is that your comment sprung a string of opinions on what Lambo actually looked like a Lambo, when all of them have been some fruitless attempts to give us another Countach.

Indeed it’s better to make a fun drive than a strictly fast one.

And this would have been a much, much worthier winner of the COTD award.

Slow comment day, eh?

It’s hard to read between the lines when there’s only one.

Well, that rear center console looks like it could be lifted, and there is something looking furiously like a 3rd seat belt on the right-hand seat in the pictures.

Oh, don’t get me wrong, it’s hard reining it in.

There’s no justice but it’s all right, thanks for the vote of confidence! :-)

Well, you kinda mentioned just the one model.