toobs-n-stuff
Toobs-n-stuff
toobs-n-stuff
2h
Save

how come none of the riders has “if you can read this, the bitch fell off” on the back of their leathers?

Oct 26
5

so, this is the Telluride/Palisade for the sorta rich folks...

you say it isn’t the same platform? surprised they can afford to do a unique platform for just this car, which is the same size as the others, which are brand new, which are very well received by the market.... can’t swing a dead cat in a whole foods Read more

Oct 26
14

I used this exact comment in a thread the other day and got no love.. sad.

thank you for validating my life choices.

Oct 26
1

good to see they are sticking with the “how can we make this car uglier” theme.

Oct 26
1

clearly you have never been to Paris. shitty weather (i.e. blizzards & thunderstorms) don’t even impact Parisian scooter riders. they all have rain gear and these skirt things that snap on to the scooter to keep their legs warm, dry and clean...

Oct 26
Save

I want back my 1981 Civic 1500DX hatchback (first car, got totaled about 6 weeks after I bought it when it got hit in a parking lot) Read more

Oct 23
2

not sure why everyone is so excited about the so called “Skateboard” in electric cars. it has been around since the late 1800's, we just used to call it “Body on Frame”, and just like the “Skateboard” you could build any number of different vehicles on the same Frame. Read more

Oct 21
Save

yes, because the Vette is engineered from the ground up to be a sports car to handle with the best european sports cars on and off the track.

the camaro is a monte carlo with a sema body kit.

engine placement has nothing to do with it, suspension design, geometry, tires, shocks and body stiffness and weight Read more

Oct 21
Save

A: torch is wrong. it is a stupid distinction without difference. as I said above. take a vette with the engine “behind” the front axle and slap a V-10 in it (which would hang over the front axle)... does that mean it is a different car or should now be called “front engine” vs “front mid engine” fuck no. for the same Read more

Oct 21
Save

most of the Jalopnik labeled “front-mid-engine” cars are objectively terrible cars that are only built that way so they can claim sporting intent... Read more

Oct 21
1

um, I do call out true rear engine in my above rant. fully behind the rear axle. look at the last sentence in paragraph 4

which is also why I suggested we need “extremely front engine” for cars like Audis where the engine is all the way in front of the front axle rather than some random proportion of it being in front Read more

Oct 21
Save

so, what do you call the toyota, and other japanese vans where the engine is between the driver and front passenger, entirely (including transmission) between the wheels, but using a conventional driveshaft and pumpkin? “true mid engine?

Oct 21
1

as much as you seem to want it to be rear-mid-engine is an unnecessary distinction.

you all go into great pains to distinguish between “front engine” and “front-mid-engine” which is a distinction without difference. when 1 millimeter of engine movement can change terminology (engine overlapping front axle by .5 mm vs Read more

Oct 17
Save

neat, they must have been running on pressure/heat built up prior to entering the tunnel, otherwise coal smoke would have been insane.  watch any of the top gear “racing an old train” videos, the amount of black smoke coming out the stack is hard to fathom.

Oct 16
Save

true, but I would think there would have been a lawsuit or outing by one of the victims by now. the fucking little girls allegations go back as far as the ‘80s, rapes of various women to the ‘70s

Oct 16
3

yes, they do, but all the evidence we have to date from Epstein, Maxwell, past lawsuits and his own mouth indicate he fucks little girls.