You’re stretching man. I prefer cars with a manual and pure styling by Pininfarina. To me, that’s a Ferrari.
You’re stretching man. I prefer cars with a manual and pure styling by Pininfarina. To me, that’s a Ferrari.
I’m well aware of that, which is why I’m saying I love it ON the GTS.
I don’t look fondly on any of those cars besides the 456.
No Nostalgia effect. Cars that have withering driver engagement and lackluster style are not worthy of being called “Sports cars”, no matter how “Super” they may be.
I don’t think anyone put down the 288, 288 Evoluzione or the F40 upon their arrival. Your argument is invalid.
Honestly, all of these cars you show have Pininfarina design and look stunning. This yellow turd looks like an emasculated corvette with birth marks.
Replace it with a psychologist.
No they don’t? Pininfarina is beautiful. This is garbage. That’s not subjective - it’s objective.
Looks like a 911 turbo that’s been hacked by an axe.
A saab story.
Because they assume that anything that doesn’t require hard labor is easy, because it’s all they know, because they’ve never actually had to sit and use their brain.
... I didn’t just say that.
Okay. Thanks boss.
What about a “Busybody”? Do you know what that is?
No, you wouldn’t, would you?