He’s over 239 lbs., but he might be a bit lighter than he looks from the complete lack of substantial muscle mass.

But the whole “I get to do whatever I want because of my religion” is a terrible road to go down, which we’re already seeing with Hobby Lobby and wedding cakes.

Chill:

Would it also cover providing your friend with some Fancy Feast?

Which first amendment right is being infringed? Association? I’m not sure I see it. Seems more likely to be a violation of substantive due process. This is a law that is designed to harm a maligned class of people: the homeless, which no basis for it outside of NIMBYism.

You know, it would have been something of a believable point if she had the balls to say “and you know the president always just parrots the last thing that he’s heard.”

Everyone knows who Trump is. Some just don’t care or even like it about him. It’s not complicated, and it hasn’t been since he started in on the Birther thing.

Observerer is probably basing this on the fact that no one in his neighborhood likes him, and he’s not even a minority.

Come on now, give the guy a break. He’s asking rich people nicely to be nice. Has anyone tried that before? I think it’ll work. I believe it so much so that I’m going to start holding my breath...

They’re just better looking. They have their teeth and take showers. That doesn’t really make you smarter.

I make good money at an office job. But thanks for the offer!

The terms of the contract are to pay with a card. If you know that, and you still entering the contract with no intention of honoring it, that is fraud. If I enter into a contract to come by and walk your dog on Monday, but I know that I’m not going to be able to do it on Monday, but I could do it on Tuesday, I’ve…

It’s fraud. I mean, I’d guess that in the example of “dine and dash,” that if you order food. Wait for it to come, and then leave without consuming any of it, that you are similarly liable. You’ve entered into a contract for the sale of food in exchange for money, but you know going in that you are not intending to…

They must know that Trump thinks they all live in shitholes, too. Right?

Don’t forget the capper: The Lord has forgiven me because I’m making America Great Again.

My point was that it is not a “debt” so the whole “legal tender for debts” goes out the window.

Trump acts like a monkey throwing feces around his cage, and SHS acts like an indignant, dead-eyed church bitch because people don’t understand him. Fuck off, cunt.

SHS gives a sincere and heartfelt apology and all you can do is denigrate her?

I very much doubt this would be considered “debt” under the UCC or any other law. There are other, different, examples where you can purchase something and incur a debt.

Sweetgreen is making you an offer to make an offer. By ordering food, you are offering to pay them for food. If you order it with no intention of actually paying for it (since you know they only accept cards), then you are committing fraud. Entering a contract with no intention to honor the contract is fraud.