perfect example of neomccarthyism: any dissent is met with accusations of being ‘one of them’

the irony here is truly magnificent

i’m not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone. if someone said to me “the russians didnt do it”, i’d say “prove it” and if someone said to me, “the russians did do it”, i’d say “prove it”.

still not following...

‘proof is proof no matter the source’ seems pretty easy to understand to me

what evidence?

who’s you guys? which facts?

not at the moment, but they are stirring up some good old fashioned cold war, red scare rhetoric

by this logic, the IC has tipped its hand and screwed us all by releasing any report at all to the public. the reports allege what was done, how it was done, etc....everything ‘we know’ about what kind of hand the other guy is holding.

did you hear anyone say it with Iraq?

i was making references to songs by the band from which you get your handle

huh? i literally said i’m going to need more than just ‘moderate confidence’, so that there is no relying on anyone’s “gut”.

your avatar says “demand evidence and think critically” yet you insinuate that i should not do the same

totally!

proof is proof no matter the source. even when it’s the “i’ll tell you anything baby, ‘cept the truth” government. ok, time for some cherry cola

“credibly sourced and plausible”

when they repeal 1A

explicit statements! claims! some with “moderate confidence”! i guess that settles it

mmmm access, you guys!

the tweet is very fishy. almost sounds satirical