Says the person who is assuming facts not in evidence for no good reason. You keep moving the goalposts, and you’re pissed because you tried to sound like you know what you’re talking about and you don’t. The woman is a liar and you’re an idiot. Good night.

I do know them, actually. And assuming for funsies that someone is a cheater and abusive isn’t without consequence. They are real people, he has a teenage daughter, and this is brutal.

Yes. Now you’re saying IF, but you were accepting it as fact earlier today. As you are now about the cheating. For someone trying to explain legal issues, you’re not doing a very good job. How would him being abusive (he wasn’t) or a cheater (he wasn’t) be at all relevant?

That makes zero sense.

So the spyware is not relevant but his supposed abuse is?

Lena Dunham has no knowledge of whether someone was sexually assaulted - she wasn’t there.

Umm she’s the abuser in this case - she set up spyware on a computer she then sold to him, and when he objected to her using that material she claimed he abused her and cheated on her. If I hadn’t shared a home with them and didn’t know that was bullshit I wouldn’t be talking about it.

Because he’s my friend and she’s claiming he’s a dirtbag and an abuser and I know otherwise.

What?

Pretending she’s been wronged by cheating is pretty rich considering what she was up to.

Why would he dispute that in a lawsuit about literary plagiarism? Its not material to whether or not she stole his work.

She says he cheated. Why would you just believe that accusation but not his?

The person I was responding to asserted that what he’s doing is awful. There’s no evidence of that, other than her word and she’s already admitted to spying on him. I think even if you knew nothing about either party you know that’s she’s a fucking weirdo and creep, so I don’t see any reason why you’d just believe her…

I’m not going to reply to that person beneath me but I’ve been a participant here for a very long time and my history speaks for itself.

Says the person, without evidence, accused of multi million dollar plagiarism.

So it’s unclear if she plagiarized but clear that he was abusive and cheated?? She admits the spyware. That’s the only admitted wrongdoing in the entire thing.

Except this is modern day, where everyone involved has at least three devices connected to the internet. Who in their right mind would use someone else’s computer to cheat when their own iPhone or MacBook is available?

I’m pretty solidly in camp “believe the abused” but I know this man personally and lived with him for several years during her relationship with him. I even lived with him while she did. I know some pretty intimate details of their relationship and I think she’s 100 percent full of shit.

A really good one. This kind of thing is hard to prove so if they took it, there’s a reason.

So she had enough access to his computer to prove he wasn’t cheating but not to see his work? What?