thespecialman
TheSpecialMan
thespecialman

That is the public reason, yes. I would even be inclined to believe if were it not for the fact that he picked 10 Club America players. This suggests to me that his squad selection does not actually conform to "tactics" or "talent" and that he is just picking players that he knows from his time in the Mexican league.

The doctors did the best they could to reconstruct his cranium, but Mickey Goldmill just wasn't the same after "The Accident."

The doctors did the best they could to reconstruct his cranium, but Mickey Goldmill just wasn't the same after "The Accident."

He won't, and the reason he won't is because Herrera is the Mexican Greg Schiano, where there is this weird inverse relationship between your talent and the esteem he holds you in.

Come on now, London isn't any closer to the Western Hockey League than Manchester.

Also, can anyone explain to me why Chicharito is playing in a Champions League match?

When I saw an article about Chicharito being on the field, I assumed that El Tri were playing New Zealand earlier than I had anticipated. Then I remembered, oh right, he's riding the bench for Mexico too (and didn't even get called up for the New Zealand game!).

I don't, actually. But I live near a college campus, and am thus subjected to hundreds of college students damn near running me over whenever I walk down the sidewalk. The part where people who nearly run over pedestrians are assholes is about the only genuine thing in this post.

Damn, that's a long-ass national anthem. No wonder the players needed it written down somewhere.

*recommends post*

Did not know that. Thanks for the info.

Gee, here we were arguing about which one of us was the bigger jerk and here you come in and take the prize away at the last second.

Actually, let me amend this. For financial reasons, it is by no means given that they could adapt. But it is theoretically possible.

What are you talking about? Are you saying that roads were invented sometime after the invention of the bicycle? I'm not being obtuse here, I genuinely can't understand your point.

The problem with this is that it is an ahistorical hypothetical. The reason transportation would be awful if people stopped riding bikes tomorrow is because city planners don't plan for such sudden jolts in traffic. However, if everyone were to slowly phase out cycling over the course of twenty years, then there would

How many is too many? This is a question best left to the philosophers.

I was actually half-kidding; I really don't mind cyclists as long as they're going the right way down the street, or not barreling through pedestrians without a horn or bell. However, this tripe you posted here is the worst, and I pray to God that I am missing some sort of joke.

Last I checked the roads were designed to accommodate car-sized objects.

Thank you for this. You can ride on the street and you're an asshole because you're blocking traffic. Or, you can ride on the sidewalk and and you're an asshole because you weave between pedestrians who can't hear you or otherwise detect your presence until you go zooming past them (getting a bell or a horn for your

Clipper? I barely know her!