I'm sure to many you have in the past. There are definitely people more equipped than I to provide you with examples though. Many definitely do feel Kotaku represents an agenda or particular perspective though, a perspective that people all over seem to think is immune to criticism.

This whole controversy is bullshit

I had a feeling Spider-man had been in a similar pose:

the people complaining have already been proven wrong about the anatomy.

I'll just leave this here.

I think Maddox covered this one pretty well.

This false equivalency stuff is getting out of hand. A woman's butt or breasts being prominently shown is NOT the equivalent of a man's penis being shown. NOT even close. Do we have clitoral outlines in comics? The equivalent body part for men is big muscles........like breasts they do not have an inherent sexual…

you guys like stuff from reddit. maybe you should watch this first before going on about this spider woman crap.

I find it interesting how many articles on gawker have prominently displayed or linked back to this 'horribly sexualized' spiderwoman pose. There comes a point where possibly valid social critique becomes just another pandering click bait opportunity. In essence, gawker's endless trotting out of the prone red butt is…

But Spider-Man has been drawn like Spider-Woman:

While I do enjoy me a good Oatmeal strip, I prefer Maddox's take on the subject:

I saw this & laughed my ass off: