I was just wondering the other day why something like this hadn't been invented yet. Definitely not worth $900, but I'd be interested in a DIY solution.

The part that likens meat-eating to plane-smoking seems like a stretch. I'd say it's more like driving a car. It hurts the environment in a pretty much negligible amount (for one person), and it makes my life better, so I do it.

I would assume so. Nicotine is nicotine, right?

How do I get from Boston to New York? Responded I can only give directions from your current location. I cant give you directions to a place you are not in.

Sounds like a job for...

*sigh*

That's a good point, but I think this type of lag is only really noticeable when it's your own finger doing the swiping. (maybe?)

My point is that fantasy DOES help fans of bad teams, because it gives you a rooting interest in players that aren't on your home team, which gives you a reason to watch all NFL games, even the bad ones.

These have always been there; they were just pink before.

Fantasy football makes random NFL games more enthralling. CFB doesn't have that (or if it does, it's not popular) because it would be impossible and probably boring.

So, not the Galaxy Tab 8.9 then? It's exactly the same as the 10.1 but with a 1.2" smaller screen.

I still don't get why so many people want tablets. I have one (that I got for free), and I almost never use it. I have a PC and a TV, and they are better suited for the stuff I would want to do on a tablet, so I use those.

Wow, that Samsung calendar is fugly! It may have higher information density, but I think it's too much. I'll give that one to Moto.

click click click.... I feel like I'm playing Diablo 3

Yeah, household income. [bit.ly]

Same people who use IE, and for the same reason - it's the default.

I'm more interested in how Forrester Research came up with those figures for the average household income for PC vs Mac owners. My bullshit alarm is going off like crazy. I can think of many reasons why that statistic is pretty much meaningless.

So you can click on the users' icons for the first 10 replies, but after that you have to click on the little >> icon and then scroll down for each additional comment? Do I have that right? I don't think there's any way I will have the patience to read more than 10 comments per article with that amount of scrolling.…

Winamp is on the decline, llamas everywhere rejoice.

The not-so-triumphant return of Analysis Rube is imminent.