Would it burst you bubble then to learn that the "Ancient Ones" are us, the audience?

Well, if you look at the "Old Gods" as being us, the audience, then the human hand makes more sense.

To be fair, the stoner still being alive falls right into the US horror movie trope. That being said, he usually sacrifices himself so the "virgin" can survive. So I wasn't surprised at all when he showed up again.

Apotheosis summed it up pretty well...but I'll try.

Because the old gods are us. In the meta framework of the movie, what occurred when the monsters were released didn't happen...that was a "behind the scenes" look, not what moviegoers would be seeing.

The vast majority of those who have seen it disagree with "not going to find much of an audience."

Read the comment above by Apotheosis. The "old ones" are us, the audience.

omg You skipped on Arrested Development? I know that tastes and opinions differ...but it's a universal truth that Arrested Development is in the top 3 best comedies on television...ever. Period. No more arguments.

Hey, if Being Human (US) is any indication, it could take him a LONG time to learn how to control his ability to interact with the real world and maybe he's starting small. ;)

I would disagree pretty heartily with alcohol.

+1

Yeah, I'll concede that the buildings are in the correct places. . .just not the sign. ;)

Here's an image that shows how far the Space Needle is from downtown: [farm4.static.flickr.com]

Man, it shouldn't but Post-apocalyptic Seattle bugs the crap out of. Sure, it could be the future and things might be different. . .but the Space Needle isn't that close to any high rises. Also, even if there were that many high rises they would have sprung up from downtown and you'd have to be north of the Space…

I think it was less balls and more ignorance. The cat doesn't know what it's facing down is a predator capable of swallowing it in one gulp. Domesticated cats often die in the wild because they simply don't understand how to survive.

Not sure how an ever changing and evolving format can be considered repetitive game dynamics. Decks play vastly different from each other, card interaction is constantly being discovered, etc. Hell, playing opponents in one store might yield completely different gameplay styles and decks than playing opponents in…

So, the fact that he was sued for plagiarism in this particular case isn't relevant?

It's different if you actually use the piece or at least credit it as a variation or something...he just straight up ripped it off and took the royalties.

Actually, his friend Klaus Badelt did the scoring, not Hans Zimmer. Hans gave him themes to use though. . .which were quite similar to several of his other works...most notably Gladiator.

See my comment below. Hans Zimmer would be guilty of this "coincidence" far too often.