So he got stuck half way between a human and a piece of wax from a diseased beehive that was left out in the sun? Or was he not going for human?
So he got stuck half way between a human and a piece of wax from a diseased beehive that was left out in the sun? Or was he not going for human?
Ah, but it’s the shape you’d least suspect, isn’t it?
Oh, see there’s the problem. I made it all the way through.
I’m pretty sure it doesn’t say 25. But please feel free to continue filling in all of the details on your own, though, and responding to a partial sentence of my directed reply.
It would be a crime, but one that’s usually dismissed before an argument is even made. Florida, like many states, has a “Romeo and Juliet Law” that applies here:
No, it really is. There are a few professors making that or more, but the median salary is nowhere near that for even full time faculty. I know many tenured faculty teaching 8 courses a year, on top of other responsibilities, making under $40K. It depends on the field and rank, but close to $200K for adjuncts that…
That’s not what they were saying at all. Saying kids do stupid things and need guidance to avoid it is not excusing anything.
I understand that, but if it’s a question of who is legally responsible for what, and which crimes were committed, there’s just not enough here to condemn anyone on except for the video. The boys were underage, just like she was. It was stupid, reckless, and gross on their part, I agree, but that’s it. There’s no…
Ok, so that would apply to the boys, too. I’m responding to the idea that she couldn’t give consent due to her mental state, and I’m not sure exactly how the boys should have been aware of that.
I don’t think any of this is “ok,” but the point was raised that it’s not possible for her to give her consent because of her history, and that the boys should have known that.
Well, if she did give consent to have sex with 25 boys in a bathroom, it doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility that she was also ok with the camera. Filming this was stupid, but does not indicate rape.
Adjuncts should be paid more (maybe not ten times more - that would average around $35,000 per class, which seems excessive). They should demand more, because the problem won’t fix itself until they do. Unfortunately, that will mean that a lot of adjuncts lose their positions, and they likely need the income. But the…
Huh? Adjunct courses are not limited to avoid overtime - that’s never been an issue, and still isn’t. This new plan does not apply to any educators - primary, secondary, or higher ed. The number of courses adjuncts can teach can be restricted to prevent having to pay for other benefits (health insurance, etc) but it’s…
I didn’t, but that’s not the point I was making, and it’s curious you’re avoiding it. Your argument is that since the girl was held captive for two years and forced to perform sex acts with her consent, any boy that has sex with her now is raping her. I’m just curious as to how the boys would know (plural in my…
Wait... how or why would you punish your son for witnessing an underage girl having sex in a school bathroom? I was a teenager a long time ago, but I had sex and knew about other teenagers having sex. Granted, I didn’t witness it and didn’t want to, but I’m curious if you feel I had some responsibility to stop it if…
Her mental state is not available information to the boys involved. If she gave consent, it’s consensual. There’s also no indication that the boys even knew about this history.
What Baylor did, or more specifically what they haven’t done, is unforgivable. But easy on the “typical Christian” thing - I’m atheist, and find fault with an awful lot of Christians (when they justify being an asshole with Bible passages), but I wouldn’t call it typical. I work at a Catholic college. We have unisex…
It’s not all the criteria. I do hear people questioning Clinton’s actions as a politician, but not her experience, nor Sander’s. They’re both qualified.
I love that a person recently convicted of a series of violent, horrific crimes, yet maintains his innocence, is using the conviction of Ligons (30 years ago) to raise questions about her credibility. I guess that means we’re free to ignore him, too.