This.
The article says he’s been removed from that school.
Watch them keep him in the district, but just switch the school up.

Vatican style.

then lost his balance and fell on top of her.

But remember people, it’s the poor child from Covington Catholic who’s the REAL victim! He was treated poorly. And is white!

I’m sorry - this sorry excuse for a teacher was not arrested immediately for assaulting an 11-year-old because why ...??

Wow... talk about sloppy seconds... I’m so glad this experienced and well educated black woman has the opportunity to clean up this racist asshole’s mess while he still makes money from the paper... progress right?

Nautical theme? Really? How stupid do they think we are?

“I could have told them that noose look wasn’t going to work”—Jussie Smollett

This is also a great way to alienate your kids. I am bi-racial and my white mother upon saying racist things and then being called out on it, would point out that she is not racist because she married my father. Which first of all is racist thing to say, and second of all points out that she thinks of our father as “ot…

Fucking hell. There really is no such thing as satire any more.

Don’t give them any more ideas

Her kids now sound like accessories.

I’d have to argue that self-praise is a wonderful thing, it lets me know that you’re completely full of yourself, and I really don’t want to be around you. In fact, telling me you’re ‘the least racist person, accepting of all the cultures and people’ set off a big red flag in my mind - “This person is suspect”. 

I almost gagged reading her self-praise about her having bi-racial and black kids and her selfless work for poor Indian people.

Your discretionary income according to the federal government is anything you make above 150% of the poverty line for your household (before taxes).

Yeah I imagine that it what will happen, just wanted to know if there was something I am missing. Its going to be hilarious/infuriating to see them refer to this as a defense, and seeing their insane numbers. Which reminds me of this...

It seems that by basing it on discretionary income (however the hell they want to decided what that is) would ostensibly avoid the above issue.

It’s the discretionary spending bit. I’d be shocked if they didn’t give a bureaucrat the power to define any caps on bills or just completely classify everything as discretionary.

The first option sounds really good...until you look into what discretionary income means to the federal government.  It’s not your income after your bills, it’s your income after the minimum amount of bills the government thinks you need to survive. 

“My brothers in Jesus Christ our savior and Lord,” the letter begins, written in the barely legible chicken scratch preferred by white supremacists everywhere. Carothers continued: