Regardless of whether there will be a civil trial, shouldn’t the criminal penalty be *more* than the person would have paid to hire a person the right way, rather than less?
Regardless of whether there will be a civil trial, shouldn’t the criminal penalty be *more* than the person would have paid to hire a person the right way, rather than less?
Either way, there’s definitely more evidence now.
Well, symbols change anyway, and the okay symbol was probably on its way toward dying of natural causes anyway (except in certain contexts, like the maybe the “diving” one mentioned above).
Yes, exactly. Holding up one’s hand to clearly and openly communicate to a person at a distance that things on the project at hand are proceeding well is totally different from this furtive easter-egg type of presentation.
If that’s really what Mitt Romney did, then that’s dumb. If someone really thinks their idea is better, then they should be happy if Trump implements it instead of continuing to do the garbage he is doing now. I mean, that’s not what’s going to happen, but if Trump implements good plans from Harris/Warren/Isley etc and…
I liked your comment but I feel the need to specify that everything you said plus cash money would not be outside the realm of what is owed, given how everything stands now.
This is the verse I would think is the culprit, because presumably it generalizes: “But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:28)
She did not molest her child — it seems like two people were raped here. Thankfully, the child is young enough to hopefully not remember and not be traumatized by the event, but the aftermath (CPS involvement, families’ name being on the internet forever, whatever the mother has to face legally, the mother’s trauma)…
I heard a study out of NYC that claimed that while housing instability wasn’t rising faster in gentrifying neighborhoods than non-gentrifying neighborhoods, noise complaints to 311 which lead directly to police interactions was.
I’m madder that she made tens of thousands of dollars in income from her book than I am about any other part of the story tbh.
I wish I had the ability to like your comment more than once.
I really just want to echo, “That’s how it was designed to work.”
I saw that and I was like, “please please please don’t let that be a typo.” I feel that I simply must live in a world where people sing letters of intent. I do live there, and anyone who tells me differently will be ignored!
Yeah. Pressing charges for what happened in that video would be pretty fucked-up.
“Yes, but not everyone who wants to secure a job is able to. Should those people... eat cake”
“Sue crazy”? For being upset when their children are mistreated in the place where they are legally compelled to go every day?
lol what...
Apparently you live in bizarro-land where cover-ups from cops need to be believable...
It works on one guy occasionally. That’s just not enough of a track record to advocate for it as a policy.
x1000. especially “when you’re not standing right there.” You can teach people to make decisions or you can teach them to be afraid and then with the latter method, when they’re on their own it’s whatever I guess.