What that shows is that starting at age 22, men generally message women younger than they are. After 22, not one line in the chart shows men contacting women the same age as they. First it's just by a year, then the gap grows to women younger by three years, then by four, and then by 50, they're messaging women of…

And you still have to have a thigh gap. And be under 25.

I'm pretty sure that when you pull a hypothetical situation out of your ass that has nothing to do with the facts of the subject case, and did not actually occur—in the service of promoting your argument that the dress code cannot possibly be either sexist in its terms or enforcement—you are making a straw man argument

Otherwise known as a "straw man" argument. Which doesn't apply here, because nobody was wearing revealing clothing.

Are your female coworkers over 18, asshole? Then they're women. Stop calling them girls. It is not regional or subjective. They are not children. You do not call your male coworkers "boys," so you should have no problem from ceasing to call your female coworkers "girls."

You give Jesus two root beer floats, and he makes them into 600 for the crowd.

Apparently, you haven't seen any pictures of the skirt Miranda Larkin wore. The skirt went almost to her knees. It did not at all reveal her underwear.

Are you a teacher, in this New Jersey school district? That's a shame, because you've misspelled several simple, third-grade-level words and write very poorly. It's starting to make me very glad I did not attend public school in New Jersey, where the standards for teacher literacy are apparently somewhat low.

Intentionally shooting anyone is a crime, unless you can prove that they were an imminent lethal threat. Cops are worth no more than any other human being. If your argument is that cops being shot is somehow more tragic than anyone else being shot, that remains your personal opinion, and not one I share.

And people who do so are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Have you lived in the U.S. only a short while, Troll?

I can guarantee you one thing, Derfel: all of those shot by police officers had not yet been tried and/or found guilty by a jury of their peers. And because, by definition, in the U.S., people are innocent until proven guilty, legally, yes, EVERY LAST PERSON killed by a police officer was innocent.

Oh, silly Discordia! Anyone whom a police officer doesn't like is a criminal

Thanks for this important work. Are you also tracking police shootings of dogs? It's difficult to find statistics about (almost wholly unwarranted, judging by the numbers of police injured or killed by civilian dogs) police shootings of dogs, but some sources say a dog is shot by police every 98 minutes in the U.S.

PRESCRIPTION birth control. Jesus fuck, trolls like you are why Gawker should have a minimum IQ requirement.

"or at least only brought up as being applicable to men"

It's a compliment to be called an "asshole" by an MRA douchecatcher.

You stupid sack of squirrel shit, the five assenters in the SCOTUS decision were men. Not women. Men.

"The fact you call me names just shows your true character and the fact you don't know how to argue like an adult."

Attention, ignorant cunt: about 15 million women in the U.S. actually do "need" birth control to treat hormonal imbalances that are potentially life-threatening.