That varies highly based on location, which is another issue with the SYSTEM. Because the bias in both directions is a SYSTEM issue. A SYSTEM overhaul will solve those problems. 

Exactly. It varies greatly. Which is one of the major problems. 

At least your children won’t grow up with someone who thinks they have less parental ability or rights because of their gender...

Didn’t miss it. It’s irrelevant.

Please tell me you don’t have sons. 

I’m sorry I tried to engage you in conversation that is above your pay grade. I agree it needs overhaul in terms of DV. I just happen to see beyond that as well. Have a good night. 

Or in reality. The system needs an overhaul for multiple reasons. Sorry that thinking is too advanced for you. 

You’re assumptions are amusing. Not a man. A woman that cares about the future of our children. Acting as if fathers are replaceable is not good for children. Pushing fathers out because you have a uterus and they don’t causes all kinds of mental health issues for kids. But, as long as you have control, that’s…

Ummm. I’m not a man, so...

They are also biased toward more physical custody time with mothers. It’s not an either or situation. 

My intelligent replies tired out your plebeian brain. Apologies.

You’ve been arguing that men shouldn’t be able to get DNA testing through the courts. Her being right doesn’t matter. The only way he could know for sure is a DNA test. That the court ordered and she refused. What happened after is a system issue. Not a reason for men to have less parental rights than women. 

Every other weekend to the father is still ridiculously standard in many places. And the custody your discussing is legal custody, not physical. Red herring. 

And she could have argued that in court. It’s not a reason to deny all men the chance to get paternity established. 

Men are not just wallets for their children. It’s okay for a woman to get a DNA test ordered to get money, but it’s not for a man so they can maybe spend time with their children. That’s the definition if cognitive dissonance. A father that wants to get paternity established is putting himself in the line of Fire for…

You have fundamental ethical differences because you have ethics. 

She gets to make the choice of who is the father before she carries to term. Not after. 

So, deadbeats shouldn’t be put in jail for not paying child support? Since child support is a civil matter. 

So, if a woman says a man is not the father he should just take her word for it? Why? How in the world is that a good solution?

Or they can be both? Family court is fucked up in more ways than one.