What would functionally be the difference? Why not call Ember and Wade fire and water monsters that live in a predominately water monster city? Monster is after all a fairly nebulous concept. And these aren’t really the first living flames and puddles that kids have been asked to accept over the years. Certainly don’t…

It looked a lot like they were trying to reference the Deep Dream era of computer assembled art, only with skrulls instead of endless dog faces. It made sense to me conceptually (“everyone looks weird and just a hint Skrull-ish, is there an invasion or am I crazy?)“, enough that figured at best they used AI for some…

You were blessed.  It sucks even more than being last on this list can convey.

I’m not really seeing that as a truism. I feel like Elemental is as easy to explain as Zootopia, probably easier to explain than Monsters Inc (“it’s a romantic comedy and it’s set in a town where elements live and sometimes the elements don’t get along especially the kinds that the two leads are” vs. “monsters live in…

“Immediately facetimed his young actor to tell him he wanted to kiss his ears mid-interview” feels like it was lifted from an article about why a director shouldn’t get to work anymore.

No way, the ending will be as follows

Spider-Man/Morbius/Venom/El Muerto will be on TV.  It’ll pan around to Kraven sitting in his dumb abs chair.  He will say “We have new prey” to a lion or something that appears from the background.  More credits.

How many articles about this do you think you can get to in a week?  I think there’s an achievement for getting to 20, like it comes with a mount and a title and stuff.

Hoping for a Gwenom and maybe a Ben Stacy where she either did or didn’t transition in that universe.

I’m just staying out of Elemental because Pixar movies used to always have something special to twist them in a fun way. But this one looks like such a basic ass romantic comedy. Like it’s just “Somewhat goofy dude meets slightly hotheaded woman, they fall in love despite being from different traditional backgrounds,…

V has rock solid mechanics, but the dumbest story of the SNES entries. It sounds like at least one of them is just waxing rhapsodic about the design process, which is cool, and the other two are both citing the mechanics, which is absolutely correct, but the villain is like an evil tree that wants to end two universes…

It also made it fairly apparent that chocobos are war steeds.  So yeah, the silly elements have been around for a long long time.

It’s a lot like having Citizen Kane at the top of movie lists.  You see it, you basically say “Yeah yeah, super groundbreaking, dazzlingly important, but I don’t especially want to watch it all the time.”

This one’s easy, this universe dies at Aquaman 2, and so we don’t have to give a shit about Brave and the Bold not having George Clooney in it.  You remember how you were able to accept that George Clooney played Batman instead of Val Kilmer that one time?  It’s that again.  Happy to help!

That is a wild read on Toy Story 4's plot.  Andy doesn’t bring Forky into the family, Bonnie makes him.  It’s why Forky is alive at all.

It’s not DnD, that’s a Semisonic song. If you’re gonna be spending time correcting the writer, the least you could do is do it correctly.  Just say D&D.

It’s D&D.

Because Fae (or sometimes “Fey”) has occasionally been a creature category type in D&D, along with stuff like Humanoid, Aberration, Outsider, and Magical Beast.

Fae isn’t a D&D species though so your argument is already starting to fall apart on merit.  I suppose you could argue that a Ranger Fae must also be accompanied by like a Human Cleric Humanoid though.

The raptors are talking about how to catch and eat a boy, so I don’t think that counts.

This just makes me more excited about the rumblings that the DGA voters may vote down their union boss’ easy deal in a show of solidarity, as all the reality shows do still need directors.  Sports shows too.