He’ll be right up there with Clebold and Harris as one of the greatest shooters in Columbine history.
He’ll be right up there with Clebold and Harris as one of the greatest shooters in Columbine history.
Rome, OK. But what did Columbine ever do to them?
Hi. We’ve been covering politics and culture on the Concourse for more than a year. Please eat shit.
Hi. We’ve been posting pieces about politics and culture here on the Concourse for more than a year. Eat shit.
Do you need a trigger warning?
Considering the circumstances, that would not be so surprising to me.
Umm, it was more than half of all the private people that she met with during her reign. It was clearly the means to gain her ear, to gain access. She was, therefore, selling her public office. What about people who lack the means to give millions to the Foundation for Graft and Influence Peddling, are they to be shut…
Honestly, I don’t really care if that’s true or not, but I 100% believe that the marriage was arranged to quash those rumors and to help out Weiner politically. The problem was that the moron is not only philanderous, but too stupid with technology to be an asset.
Aaaaand mystery solved.
You just remade Gremlins 2.
True, with mechanophile and pedophile being such small niches, I’d imagine you don’t get much overlap.
Every time she’s mentioned in a headline, there’s a moment where I question “what’s the Zephyr Teachout?” and then it clicks that ZT is a person, not a group of educators on strike.
I believe the sexual assault part was to remind us that we should hate the school’s stance of trigger warnings/safe spaces because they have unrelated issues elsewhere.
As a 29 year old millennial, I can’t abide apologist pussies in my generation. Political incorrectness is covered in free speech, the most important right that we have. Safe spaces and trigger warnings are merely accepted terms for censorship.
I don’t know about Chicago specifically, but there have been cases of protesters blocking access and assaulting student reporters for “invading their safe protest space”
As a current student at the University of Chicago I can agree with your BFs sentiment. It must be in the water. I thought the statement (and this is the first time I am seeing it) is balanced and very needed.
Ok, but if you’re teaching a class and you have student whose participation (and subsequent tests based on that participation) is necessary to determine their grade, what do you do for the student who asks (demands, more accurately) to miss entire sections of the class, or entire segments of the syllabus, because it…
I’m a younger millennial, and are you joking? Safe spaces might be valid but the discussion over them has certainly been cartoonized both by their detractors and supporters and to ignore this fact and the fact that they’re used to browbeat dissent only hurts any attempt to fix social issues.
I think the whole “occupation of the president’s office” detail was the part they had trouble with... and they still let him graduate anyway.
But that is the rub. One person’s politically incorrect speech is another person’s civil rights. Homosexuals were being politically incorrect when looking for civil rights. Should we have shut down their voices?