You're thinking about the dialogue in this game waaaaaaay more than the writers did.

Pssssst...not all sarcasm is conveniently labeled as such.

Oh, for God's sake. If you're going to blatantly farm content from Reddit, couldn't you at least bother to edit the guy's atrocious writing?

Seriously. Is there any scenario in which a review embargo doesn't indicate the game is shit?

With no multiplayer, you're essentially paying ten bucks per hour of gameplay, so yeah it matters. Everyone likes to bring up Portal as an example of a great short game, but remember that it was one of five games in The Orange Box; no one was paying $60 for it alone.

Attention all workers, would-be workers and future workers of the world: This is what it looks like when you don't have a union.

Honestly? I think they're gonna hold the line. Everything Kim et al. have said publicly has been supportive and (amazingly) discreet. As incredible as it might be to ponder, the Kardashians might end up doing some real good in the world.

Late, sure, but it wouldn't shock me in the slightest to find out that you don't have any female friends.

Total horseshit. PI's don't provide livestreaming updates, law firms aren't open on Friday night, no lawyer's gonna meet with someone at 7AM on MLK Day, the last thing on anyone's mind during something like this is going to be posting regular updates to fucking Reddit...the list goes on. It's entertaining but it's…

Offensive is a hard term to quantify and it means different things to different people. Having an explicit "policy" towards what to sell and not sell, in my mind, does nothing but make it easier for the petulant schoolboy contingent of the Internet to cry foul whenever it feels its "rights" are being violated because…

Dogs vs. cats. Because fourth grade never really ended.

What's with people taking a harmless jab at a videogame so goddamn personally? You'd think laser beams insulted someone's grandmother or something.

I realize that people are born every day. I'm not uncomfortable with aging and I don't particularly care about being "old."

Nah, my reply is just going to be, "[shaking my head and laughing at you]." Just like everyone else in this thread.

Playing Devil's Advocate is one thing. But your continued hostility kiiiiiinda makes it sound like you're on the dude's side. Which is why everyone is assuming you're on the dude's side.

So just to clarify: She may have had sex with hockey players before, but because she did not want to have sex with this particular hockey player, she was asking to be called a cunt and this is all her fault. Correct?

Oh, you.

So...she was asking for it?

You classify that as "an argument"? Sorry brodude, but in the real world calling a woman who won't sleep with you a "cunt" under a photo of yourself in your team uniform is a quick ticket out the door.

Seriously. What do these chucklefucks think is going to happen?