Yes! The same free money that pays for roads and libraries!

Perhaps because its relevant to science and technology?

A Gizmodo editor

We could also put more value on art and history as a society. Then those skills would be economically useful.

That was a super trolly way of saying something that’s correct ;-)

I assume you consider telecommunications and biology liberal arts majors then? Because people with those degrees are unemployed or underemployed too.

We’re not, actually, talking about the education itself, were talked about access to it, and no, not everyone has the same access to the internet. Public libraries do what they can, but in the places that need them most they are underfunded, under resourced, under staffed, and under assault.

That’s a flaw in the way higher education is structured. Under no circumstances should teenagers be lead to believe that a four year classroom experience is needed, or even valuable to, every profession.

That’s not even an argument- the internet is not free, and there are no free accredited (read: counts for employment opportunities) internet education programs. Furthermore, free access to education is super not compulsory education.

Actually, what he is asking for is internet and education where the cost is not put to the individual, but to the country as a whole, much like public libraries and public roads already are.

I would order that the network/consumer relationship be restructured such that when you buy into “television” (either through a cable service or an internet service, both are available for the same price (providers can compete with each other)), you are given a fixed number of “likes” or “tokens” or something that you…

I dunno if Pygmalion myth derivatives are inherently sexist though- sure, the fact that its always objectified women that are the focus of these plots, and that there are often a lot of misogynistic things in these stories (and that the stories are always about the men around the fabricated woman, not the women…

Peer pressure is not coercion, its simply a fact of humanity, and the debate is not about normal people wanting to get rid of weird people- its about the ability to choose intentionally what your baby will be like rather than just bowing to the whims of fate. You argument is akin to arguing that people should not have…

No, the beginning of her end was deciding to stay in Meereen in the first place. Sending away Jorah was the final nail in the coffin.

You do keep saying it, and it keeps being wrong. You want to ensure they have a choice, campaign for choice, do not campaign for no one to have choice.

They aren’t actually “supposed” to protect individuals, their supposed to enforce the law. The difference is horrifying, obviously.

You absolutely cannot argue that taking away choice is better for everyone without being a fascist.

I think it was more about showing what it looks like, rather than trying to say #notallmen "look, men get sexualized too!"

What causes your body to turn on itself (aging and cancer and autoimmune disorders) and how to fix it.

I can't recall what finally got me to pick it up, but I'm so glad I did.