I'd assume that it's not about women being sexy, it's about women being naked, vulnerable, and unaware that they're 'putting on a show' for men that they have probably rejected who feel that they're getting revenge for the woman turning them down that one time.

Everything he said reminds me of those hilariously naive educational films from the 1950s about what the future would be like: "And meals will be in PILL FORM! And we'll go to work in our FLYING CARS in the bright future of 1988!"

Pro-lifers are pissed off that she didn't do her God-given duty of bearing her husband's children up to the moment of her death.

Cat and Dog should get together.

Anita has been accused of faking these threats and not actually making police reports before. The actual people who accused her of it found out themselves that not only was she telling the truth, she was also dealing with the FBI.

I don't interpret it as smugness. I'm no fan of Sarkeesian's presentation style, but in this instance, I believe that Tweet should be read as, "Seriously, the fuck. You're not going to shut me up, so keep trying."

In that—even if I disagree with her methods (though I do agree with her message, as she's been bang-on…

IT IS NOT 4CHAN. This is a false flag by /whichever agency/, probably NSA or something.

There's places in the world where this is not a problem. It's more like, "Where do you want to eat?" "You know where there's food?"

Oof. Is it just me or does it not look particularly good? Kind of reminds me of the vaguely vapid-expressioned and dead-eyed creepy statue someone made of Britney Spears giving birth.

I think this is actually a great idea! The research on electronics and sleep is concerned with the light they emit, so if you are listening to the audiobook in the dark rather than reading, it's definitely better.

did you work at the Betty Friedan High School for Evolved Youth because I think the only time I have ever heard a high school guy use the word "breast" was to describe the kind of chicken they prefer

Thank you for not calling a "scandal"

I do. I refer to it as a leak, a violation of privacy and a sex crime.

Are you saying that the risk of being sexually assaulted is equal to the risk of being over-charged for a cocktail?

Tip for men: don't be creepy so women won't have to do this

Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it's not leeching. I have no idea if this is really a concern or not, but it's not a good idea to repost stuff from blogs without doing any research first.

Does anyone out there remember Sue Johanson? When I was in university, we would all congregate on Sunday nights to watch her sex advice show. Absolutely brilliant. This article reminded me of her.

I don't know. It's only Tuesday. So I'm hopeful but also so scared about what's to come.

Callie, I agree completely with your comment. If you see this reply, I hope I express myself well. My initial reaction seeing the words "it's so much harder to exist as a woman on the internet" is to recoil. This is partly a more general reaction, I think, to "it's so much harder to exist [in space x] as [member of…

The entire point of your post was factually inaccurate and existed only to shift attention from a real issue to a fake one. Idiot isn't hateful in that case, it's descriptive.