Satcom?

So...is that a reflection of the rear lights on the underside of the spoiler, or is there actually an epic CHMSL built into it?

Or leave the bridge are as is, and take out everything but the turbolasers and you have the Corellian Gunship.

That’s pretty mind blowing. I knew the V6 was V8 derived, but I assumed it was a shorter casting, like GM did with Chevrolet’s 4.3L and Buick’s 3.8L.

I’m curious as well. I’ve heard similar rumblings, but never heard any specifics so it would be nice to see it all laid out.

An original LeBaron convertible in mint original condition is mildly collectible as a period piece. But this ‘restomodded’ monstrosity? No way. It isn’t collectible at all, and is somehow uglier than an original. I think even K-car fanatics (yes, they’re out there) would turn their noses up at this.

Look up 2453 Arthur Kill Rd Staten Island, NY 10309 on Historic Aerials and be amazed.

TIL. And appropriately enough, here's a picture:

I, too, like trains. Good call.

The Saudis fly large numbers of standard Eagles, so that's probably one of them rather than a Strike Eagle.

There used to be one with a stick in Hoboken, NJ parked on the street every day. The first time I saw it walking to class I nearly fell over in shock. They're out there, but I can't imagine many are left.

Don't give Ryanair any idea.

Car on a truck hit by a train carrying cars.

Please tell me that name is a Engrish translation of 'Rambo'.

Can someone explain to me why there's a DOHC 3.6L under this hood rather than the 4.3L, V8-derived engine found in the full size trucks? The 4.3L is smaller and likely lighter than the 3.6L, and it's power curve is much better suited to truck use than the high revving 3.6L.

This sort of thing has been happening with ACOGs, Aimpoints, AN/PEQ-2 lasers, and all sorts of military gear for years. In fact, buying a used ACOG is a risky proposition these days, because the manufacturer (Trijicon) will not replace the tritium illumination on stolen military optics when it inevitably degrades.

That's not as real as I was expecting, thankfully.

...what's the context of this image? It looks bad, and it looks real, and I (rather morbidly) want to know more.

While you're technically right, the button location is no longer centralized. I rather like that feature on mine, even if it isn't the standard in US market vehicles.

No more central locking? Lame.