I think the fact her “Santa is white” comment gets so much more attention than her “Jesus was white” comment — which was made in the same segment — says a lot about America.

Anger is a great motivator.

I was really disappointed when Kelly Evans apologized for asking legit questions, while Paul Rand was shushing her. I think all women intending to interview Paul Rand in the future need to take a page from this bad ass.

For me, she wasn’t saying “Santa Claus is based on the historical figure of St. Nicholas who, yes was white, specifically Greek, and hailing from a town in modern-day Turkey” (which also ignores the fact that the modern mythological figure that lands on roofs via flying-reindeer pulled sleigh is a significant…

she then asks Rand Paul: “Did you get overly emotional?”

Could be another example of Megyn Kelly caring about issues that directly affect Megyn Kelly....

where is the naked in the hallway story with the generous asian man?

See? Men are just TOO emotional to be president. What if he gets into a spiteful bad mood and launches nukes or something? Men have such delicate feelings and just can’t control them, the poor dears.

The dirt worst! You know how when you see an article on the Internet and you tell yourself “Never read the comments”? Scott Walker is those comments in human form.

I suspect his unwillingness to answer isn’t him being flustered. It’s more about him showing The Base that he has the requisite amount of contempt for the Liberal Media. This plays to us like condescending and childish bullshit, but he’s not playing to us. He’s playing to the people who would see this and say “yeah,…

Also, presenting facts for context prior to a question is typically how an interview is conducted. But what do I know. I’m a random internet commentator.

Listen, dude. She has a degree in journalism, got her JD magna cum laude from Georgetown, and had the #1 score on the bar exam before beginning a career in litigation. I think she knows how to ask questions.

If he gets this uppity over a reporter questioning his changed positions on foreign policy, he should back out now prior to debate season. He isn’t up for the challenge nor smart enough. An intelligent person would ignore the editorializing tone and state their views. A moron attacks the interviewer and makes…

This is the current GOP. Facts are a liberal conspiracy.

This picture could go into a dictionary next to the term “Mansplaining” and I’m not even sure you’d need a definition.

It would be so easy to make this guy melt down on camera. Send a smart woman to interview him and give her instructions to poke him on any duplicitous answer. Start a couple questions with “As a woman, I’d like to ask you...”

“If you’re going to tell me how to run my own interview and disrespectfully talk over me, then there will be no interview. Have a nice day, Senator.” — what I wish she’d said

i feel like providing a list of facts isn’t the same as editorializing?

Don’t you just wish that sometimes you had a universal eject button? When some pompous, patronizing nitwit starts douchebabbling at you, you could push you’re button and with a comical “SPROING!” the person would be flung 30 feet away.